DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2024, 16(3):172-184 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2024.016

Smart city indicators and the conceptual problems of measuring smart cities

Tamás Dusek
a Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Egyetem tér 1., Hungary

As the popularity of smart city research is increasing, the measurement of smartness became also a popular research topic. This is in accordance with the demand of the planners and project financing institutions for the success indicators, and with the observable tendency of new indicators for describing the settlements from the point of view of the quality of life, liveability, creativity, environment, social capital, development and many other fashionable research aspects of modern urban societies. Analyses through such indicators run the risk of taking a mechanistic, technocratic, superficial approach to complex urban systems, ignoring the complex causal relationships between urban subsystems and the interpretative and statistical uncertainties behind the indicators. Moreover, these composite or complex indicators merge very different basic indicators, often with low data quality and validity. This paper focuses on the uncertainties of smart city indicators, which are often used to form composite indicators that moreover form the basis for comparisons of smartness of cities. The transformation of a multi-indicator system into a one-dimensional metric scale is a highly questionable practice. Composite indicators, despite their popularity, are methodologically and conceptually highly problematic analytical tools for researchers and normative targets for policy makers.

Keywords: smart city, composite indicators, proxy indicators, spatial level, decision support tools, monitoring

Published: February 3, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dusek, T. (2024). Smart city indicators and the conceptual problems of measuring smart cities. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, 16(3), 172-184. doi: 10.32725/det.2024.016
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3-21. Go to original source...
    2. Baji, P. (2017). Okos városok és alrendszerek - Kihívások a jövő városkutatói számára? Tér és Társadalom, 31(1), 89-105. Go to original source...
    3. Bastiat, F. (2010). That Which Is Seen and That Which Is Not Seen: The Unintended Consequences of Government Spending. Classic Book Library.
    4. Bowen, S., & Kreindler, S. A. (2008). Indicator Madness: A Cautionary Reflection on the Use of Indicators in Healthcare. Healthcare Policy, 3(4), 41-48. Go to original source...
    5. Campbell, N. R. (1920). Physics, the elements. London: Cambridge University Press.
    6. Carli, R., Dotoli, M., Pellegrino, R., & Ranieri, L. (2013). Measuring and Managing the Smartness of Cities: A Framework for Classifying Performance Indicators. Proceedings of IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Go to original source...
    7. Dahler-Larsen, P. (2012). The Evaluation Society. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
    8. Dusek, T. (2024). A mérés és méréselmélet néhány alapkérdése. Statisztikai Szemle, 102(2), 107-157. Go to original source...
    9. Egyed, I., & Rácz, S. (2020). The Role of Territorial Capital in Urban Renewal in a Non-core Central European City. Deturope, 12(3), 108-132. Go to original source...
    10. Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2016). Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    11. Feenan, R., Kelly, J., McBryde, W., Clark, G., & Moonen, T. (2017). The Universe of City Indices. Decoding City Performance. Chicago, London, Singapore: Jones Lang Lassale.
    12. Fernandez-Anez, V. (2016). Stakeholder approach to smart cities. A survey on smart city definitions. Smart Cities, First International Conference, Smart-CT 2016, Proceedings, 157-167. Go to original source...
    13. Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2024). The Ordinal Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
    14. Gere, L. (2018). An Introduction and Critical Assessment of Smart City Developments. Deturope, 10(3), 33-52. Go to original source...
    15. Giffinger, R. (2007). Smart Cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Centre of Regional Science.
    16. Gyimesi, Á., & Somlyódyné Pfeil, E. (2021). Az adat és a kormányzás jelentősége az okos város stratégiai alapú értékteremtési folyamatában - Magyar nagyvárosok összehasonlítása egy szintetizáló ökoszisztéma modell keretében. Tér és Társadalom, 35(3), 59-86. Go to original source...
    17. IESE Cities in Motion Index (2018). Business School University of Navarra. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15581/018.ST-471 Go to original source...
    18. IESE Cities in Motion Index. (2022). Business School University of Navarra. https://www.iese.edu/media/research/pdfs/ST-0633-E.pdf
    19. IESE Cities in Motion Index. (2024). Business School University of Navarra. iese.edu/media/research/pdfs/ST-0649-E.pdf
    20. Józsa, V. (2020). Miskolc - A Central and Eastern European City in the Crossroads. Deturope, 12(3), 82-107. Go to original source...
    21. Kitchin, R. (2014). The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1-14. Go to original source...
    22. Klusáček, P., Konečnŷ, O., Zgodová, A., & Navrátil, J. (2020). Application of the Smart City Concept in Process of Urban Recycling - Case Study of Spitálka in Brno, Czech Republic. Deturope, 12(1), 22-40. Go to original source...
    23. Kulcsár, L. (2020). Elméleti és módszertani megfontolások az életminőség, a jóllét kutatásához. Statisztikai Szemle, 98(11), 1239-1287. Go to original source...
    24. Lai, C. M. T., & Cole, A. (2023). Measuring progress of smart cities: Indexing the smart city indices. Urban Governance, 3, 45-57. Go to original source...
    25. Lazaroiu, G. C., & Roscia, M. (2012). Definition Methodology for the Smart Cities Model. Energy, 47(1). 326-332. Go to original source...
    26. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the Smart City Performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137-149. Go to original source...
    27. Mau, S. (2019). The Metric Society. On the Quantification of the Social. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    28. Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
    29. Nagy, Z., Sebestyénné Szép, T., & Szendi, D. (2018). Smart cityk teljesítménye a visegrádi országokban. Erdélyi Társadalom, 16(1), 59-82.
    30. O'Neil, K. (2015). Weapons of Math Destruction. Penguin Books.
    31. Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    32. Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81, 1-23. Go to original source...
    33. Salnikova, S., & Khanin, O. (2022). Socio-economic Indicators of the Ukrainian Lutsk City Development: Dynamics, Trends, and Some Paradoxes. Deturope, 14(1), 189-211. Go to original source...
    34. Szalai, Á. (2020). Az okosváros-koncepció kritikai földrajzi vizsgálata - elméleti háttér és lehetséges kutatási irányok. Tér és Társadalom, 34(2), 88-107. Go to original source...
    35. Szép T., Nagy Z., & Tóth, G. (2021). Lehet az alkalmazkodóképesség vonzó? A rugalmas ellenálló képesség szerepe a magyar városok példáján. Statisztikai Szemle, 99(8), 709-730. Go to original source...
    36. Uszkai, A. (2016). Evaluation of Vienna's World Economic Position Based on Global and World City Rankings. Deturope, 8(3), 72-87. Go to original source...
    37. Torre, A. (2022). Smart Development for Peripheral Areas. A Never-ending Story? Tér és Társadalom, 36(3), 10-27. Go to original source...
    38. Zygiaris, S. (2013). Smart City Reference Model: Assisting Planners to Conceptualize the Building of Smart City Innovation Ecosystems. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2), 217-231. Go to original source...
    39. Z. Karvalics, L. (2017). Okos városok, kérdő- és felkiáltójelekkel. Szombathely, Kőszeg: Savaria University Press, Felsőbbfokú Tanulmányok Intézete.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content