DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2018, 10(2):17-37 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2018.011

Regional Development and its Measurement in Visegrad Group Countries

Ingrid Majerová
Silesian University in Opava, School of Business Administration in Karvina Univerzitni nam. 1934/3, 73340 Karvina, Czech Republic

Keywords: Min-Max method, NUTS 2, Regional Development Index, Visegrad Group countries

The aim of the paper is to measure regional development and construct an index for the Visegrad Group countries at NUTS 2 level. This index, called the Regional Development Index - the RDI - is created as an extension of the Human Development Index in order to obtain a better composed index at regional level. Twelve socio-economic indicators are selected for this purpose: three economic indicators, three educational indicators, three health variables and three indicators of the standard of living which create four dimensions. These variables are tested for their reliability through the pairwise correlation and the min-max method is used for the construction of the index. The data are compared between 2008 and 2013 and the assumption about worsening the situation in regions after the crisis is set. The results show that the values of the RDI improved in nearly all regions (with the exception of Prague in the Czech Republic and Közép-Magyarország in Hungary) in the monitored years. The assumption that regional development was negatively influenced by economic crisis has not been confirmed.

Published: July 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Majerová, I. (2018). Regional Development and its Measurement in Visegrad Group Countries. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism10(2), 17-37. doi: 10.32725/det.2018.011
Download citation

References

  1. Agbeboh, G. U., & Osaarumwense, O-I. (2013). Empirical Analysis of road traffic accident: A case study of Kogi State, North-Central Nigeria: Ambrose Alli University. Ekpoma Nigeria, 8(40), 1923-1933.
  2. Akócsi, I. L., Bencze, S., & Tóth, T. (2012). New Determination of Human Development at Regional Level in the Countries of Visegrad. Selye e-studies. [10-08-2017] Retrieved from http://www.selyeuni.sk/gtk/e-studies/en/homepage/doc_details/8-201202.html
  3. Anand, S., & Bärnighausen, T. (2004). Human resources and health outcomes: cross-country econometric study. The Lancet, 364(9445), 1603-1609. Go to original source...
  4. Banthia, P., Koirala, B., Rauniyar, A., Chaudhary, D., Kharel, T., & Khadka, S. B. (2006). An epidemiological study of road traffic accident cases attending emergency department of teaching hospital. J. Nepal Med. Assoc, 45(162), 38-243.
  5. Basu, S., & Basu, P. (2005). Regional Disparity in Australia: Analysis of Gender Development Index. International Review of Business Research Paper, 1(2), 56-66.
  6. Bloom, D., & Canning, D. (2003). Health as Human Capital and its Impact on Economic Performance. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 28(2), 304-315. Go to original source...
  7. Bočková, N. (2013). Visegrad Four Countries: Evaluation in R&D Sectors of Performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianare Brunensis, 61(4), 873-880. Go to original source...
  8. Borowy, I. (2013). Road Traffic Injuries: Social Change and Development. Medical History, 57(1), 108-138. Go to original source...
  9. Eugenio-Martin, J. L., Morales, N. M., & Scarpa, R. (2004). Tourism and Economic Growth in Latin American Countries: A Panel Data Approach. FEEM Working Paper No. 26.2004. Milano: FEEM. Go to original source...
  10. Eurostat (2014). Glossary: Purchasing power standard (PPS). Retrieved January 4, 2018, from ec.europa.eu/eurostat/Statistic-explained/index.php/Glossary:Purchasing_power_standard_(PPS)
  11. Eurostat (2017). Regional Database. Retrieved September 10, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/regions/data/database
  12. Fingleton, B. (2003). European Regional Growth. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Go to original source...
  13. Florida, R., Mellander, Ch., & Stolarick, K. (2008). Inside the black box of regional development-human capital, the creative class and tolerance. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), 615-649. Go to original source...
  14. Gabdrakhmanov, N. K., & Rubtsov, V. A. (2014). Tourist and Recreational Positioning of Tatarstan Republic: Cluster Analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal (Management, Economics, Technology & Tourism), 30, 202-205.
  15. Gaye, A., & Jha, S. (2010) A Review of Conceptual and Measurement Innovations in National and Regional Human Development Reports, 1998-2009. Human Development Research Paper 2010/21. New York: UNDP.
  16. Gebru, M. K. (2017). Road traffic accident: Human security perspective. International Journal of Peace and Development Studies. 8(2), 15-24, March 2017. Go to original source...
  17. Gnesi, C., Serge, E., & Villa, A. (2010). Come si vive in Italia? Rapporto QUARS 2010 - Indice di qualità regionale dello sviluppo. [08-09-2017]. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/89126214/quars-2010
  18. Halásková, R., & Mikuąová Meričková, B. (2017). Socio-economic development, income inequality and redistribution. Ekonomická revue - Central European Review of Economic Issues, 20, 29-41.
  19. Hardeman, S., & Dijkstra, L. (2014). The EU Regional Human Development Index. JRC Science and Policy Reports. Report EUR 26817. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  20. Hudec, O., & Prochádzková, M. (2015). Visegrad Countries and Regions: Innovation Performance and Efficiency. Quality Innovation Prosperity, 19(2), 55-72. Go to original source...
  21. Kasim, J., Fron, H., & Yaqub, H. (2011). Using cluster analysis to assess the dimensions of the HDI in Iraq for 2006, Journal of Research Diyala humanity, 49, 625-649.
  22. Kozuń-Cie¶lak, G. (2016). Two Faces of Regional Innovativeness - the Evidence from Visegrad Group States. In Sborník příspěvků XIX. mezinárodní kolokvium o regionálních vědách Čejkovice, 325-331. Go to original source...
  23. Majerova, I. & Nevima, J. (2016). Factor Analysis as an Alternative Approach to Measurement of Human Development. International Journal of Economics and Statistics, 4, 180-185.
  24. Majerova, I., & Nevima, J. (2017). The measurement of human development using the Ward method of cluster analysis. Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 239-257. Go to original source...
  25. Medlock, K. B., & Soligo, R. (2002). Car Ownership and Economic Development with Forecasts to the Year 2015. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 36(2), 163-188.
  26. Michaud, P. C. & van Soest, A. (2008). Health and wealth of elderly couples: Causality tests using dynamic panel data models. Journal of Health Economics, 27(5), 1312-1325. Go to original source...
  27. Moore, D. S., Notz, W. I, & Flinger, M. A. (2013). The basic practice of statistics (6th ed.). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  28. Nevima, J., & Kiszova, Z. (2011). Evaluation of regional competitiveness in case of the Czech and Slovak Republic using analytic hierarchy process. Advances in Economics, Risk Management, Political and Law Science, 1-6.
  29. Nijkamp, P., & Abreu, M. (2009). Regional Development Theory. Submitted paper PN218MA-EOLSS. Retrieved September 7, 2017, from ftp://zappa.ubvu.vu.nl/20090029.pdf
  30. OECD (2002). Frascati Manual. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD Publications Service.
  31. Pagliani, P. (2010). Influence of regional, national and sub-national HDRs. Human Development Research Paper 2010/19. Washington, D.C.: UNDP.
  32. Pérez, E. A., & Nadal, J. R. (2005), Host Community Perceptions A Cluster Analysis. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(4), 925 - 941. Go to original source...
  33. Riley, K. (2002). Motor Vehicles in China: The Impact of Demographic and Economic Changes. Population and Environment, 23(5), 479-494. Go to original source...
  34. Rovan, J., & Sambt, J. (2003). Socio-economic Differences Among Slovenian Municipalities: A Cluster Analysis Approach. Development in Applied Statistic. Metodoloąki zvezki, 19, 265-278.
  35. Semyonov, M., Lewin-Epstein, N., & Maskileyson, D. (2013). Where wealth matters more for health: The wealth-health gradient in 16 countries. Social Science & Medicine, 81, 10-17. Go to original source...
  36. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Publishing.
  37. Shafik, N. (1994). Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 757-773. Go to original source...
  38. Toyota (2017). The High Rate of Economic Growth and Motorization. Retrieved September 11, 2017, from http://www.toyota-global.com/company/history_of_toyota/75years/text/entering_the_automotive_business/chapter1/section2/item1.html
  39. Tuan, V. A. (2011). Dynamic Interactions between Private Passenger Car and Motorcycle Ownership in Asia: A Cross-country Analysis. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 9, pp. 1-16.
  40. UNDP (2015). Training Material for Producing National Human Development Reports. UNDP Human Development Report Office, Occasional Paper. Retrieved December 15, 2017, from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdi_training.pdf
  41. UNDP (2016). Human Development Report 2016. Human Development for Everyone. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
  42. Van Den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2009). The GDP Paradox. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 117-135. Go to original source...
  43. Verner, T., & Chudarkova, S. (2013). The Economic Growth and Human Capital: The Case of Visegrad Countries. In A. Kocourek (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Liberec Economic Forum, (pp. 610-617). Liberec: Technical University Liberec.
  44. WEF (2017). White Paper. Accelerating Workforce Reskilling for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. An Agenda for Leaders to Shape the Future of Education, Gender and Work. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
  45. Yang, Y., & Hu, A. (2008). Investigating Regional Disparities of China's Human Development with Cluster Analysis: A Historical Perspectiv. Social Indicators Research, 86(3), 417-432. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.