DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2019, 11(3):229-249 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2019.035

A City for the Next Generation? Introduction to the 'KRAFT' Complex System of Indicators in Case of Veszprém City with Special Attention to the Different Age Groups of Local Residents

Mariann Szabó
Institute of Advanced Studies Kőszeg (Chernel street 14, 9730 Kőszeg, Hungary)

Keywords: Sustainable cities and communities, small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs), regional development, 'KRAFT' complex system of indicators, generations

Nowadays we face the increasing significance of regions as social, cultural, political and economic interaction systems (Agnew, 2000, 2001 and Haukkala et al., 1999 in Palekiene, Simanaviciene, & Bruneckiene, 2015). Due to the ongoing changes in global economy they face several challenges regarding the well-being of their inhabitants. Meanwhile, it is worth to consider that the different inhabitants and stakeholders would have different preferences for the development and use of various sources of the settlement. The differences in the utility functions may lead to conflicts. These conflict would arise among new comers and current land owners, businesses and NGOs or among inhabitants too, even among generation groups (like the case of "OK, Boomer"). As the economic concentrations attract increasing number of residents small and medium-sized towns (SMSTs) must design programs which improves their population retention. Challenging that, the KRAFT ('Creative City, Sustainable Region') Concept developed by iASK (Institute of Advanced Studies Kőszeg, Hungary) is a regional development initiative, which focuses on the connectivity and cooperation of key players. One of the major outcomes of the initiative is the 'KRAFT' complex system of indicators ('KRAFT-index'), an analytical tool suitable to demonstrate regional development tendencies regarding eight specific development areas (economic development, governance, social vitality, health, culture, networks, natural and built environment and education, learning). In 2017 we have conducted an on-site survey: during 2 months 1,200 questionnaires have been collected in Veszprém city. The computer-assisted data collection (filling one questionnaire required about 35-40 seconds) with the tracking ensure the representability checkable. The data collection aimed at identifying and collecting opinions and attitudes of local residents 16 years old and above, having permanent or temporary address in Veszprém. The sample is representative by age, gender and district (based on an integrated urban development strategy). The aim of the current research is to highlight differences in behavioural patterns and satisfaction among the generations which could be influential in the long-term development of the city which will be the European Capital of Culture 2023. The research results underline the significance of applying the generation theory into regional strategic planning, since dominant differences would be observed how the groups evaluate the environmental conditions, community cohesion of the city, as well as what environmental factors they evaluate as important and to what extent they are attached to the settlement.

Published: October 31, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Szabó, M. (2019). A City for the Next Generation? Introduction to the 'KRAFT' Complex System of Indicators in Case of Veszprém City with Special Attention to the Different Age Groups of Local Residents. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism11(3), 229-249. doi: 10.32725/det.2019.035
Download citation

References

  1. 2023veszprem.hu (online). Veszprém - Balaton 2023 European Capital of Culture. Retrieved from: http://2023veszprem.hu/en/ecc-programme/
  2. Arcadis (online). Citizen Centric Cities. The Sustainable Cities Index 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.arcadis.com/media/1/D/5/%7B1D5AE7E2-A348-4B6E-B1D7-6D94FA7D7567%7DSustainable_Cities_Index_2018_Arcadis.pdf
  3. Barysheva, G., & Kashchuk, I. (2015). Improving the socio-emotional well-being of the older generation through the implementation of territorial marketing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166(2015), 62 - 68. Go to original source...
  4. Camagni, R. & Capello, R. (2013). Regional Competitiveness and Territorial Capital: A Conceptual Approach and Empirical Evidence from the European Union, Regional Studies, 47(9), 1383-1402, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2012.681640 Go to original source...
  5. Csapó, T., & Lenner, T. (2012): Settlement Morphology of Veszprém. (In Hungarian Language). Geographical Review, 136(4), 439-452.
  6. Gébert, J., Bajmócy, Z., & Málovics, G. (2017). How to Evaluate Local Economic Development Projects from a People-Centred Perspective? An Analytical Framework Based on the Capability Approach. Deturope, 9(2), 4-24. Go to original source...
  7. Hardi, P., & Pintér, L. (2007). City of Winnipeg Quality-of-Life Indicators, in: Sirgy, M.J., Rahtz, D., Swain, D. (Eds.): Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases II. Springer, pp.127-176 Go to original source...
  8. Hungarian Central Statistical Office [HCSO], online. Retrieved from: http://www.ksh.hu/?lang=en
  9. Fekete, D. (2018). Economic Development and Economic Governance Through the Example of the City of Győr. Deturope, 10(1), 97-115. Go to original source...
  10. investinveszprem.com (online). Economic sectors of Veszprém. Retrieved from: http://investinveszprem.com/eco
  11. Kovács, T. (2017). Kisújszállás, 'the Cultural Capital of Great Cumania' - Shrinkage, Resilience and Culture-Based Urban Development in East Hungary. Deturope, 9(3), 122-140. Go to original source...
  12. La Rosa, D., Spyra, M., & Inostroza, L. (2016). Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review. Ecological Indicators, 61(2016), 74-89. Go to original source...
  13. Marzukhi, M. A., Omar, D., Leh, O. L.H., Hamir, M. S., & Bargchi, M. (2011). Malaysian Urban Indicator Network: A Sustainable Development Initiative in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Science, 25, pp. 77-84.
  14. Mercer (online). Quality of Living Ranking. Retrieved from: https://mobilityexchange.mercer.com/Insights/quality-of-living-rankings
  15. Miszlivetz, F., & Márkus, E. (2013). The KRAFT Index: Creative Cities - Sustainable Regions. Budapest Management Review, 44(9). 2-21. Go to original source...
  16. Morvay, S. (2017). Cultural Ambitions of Cities in Central and Eastern Europe in the Light of Two Cities' - Tallin and Maribor - Case Studies. Deturope, 9(3), 162-176. Go to original source...
  17. nepesseg.com (online). Retrieved from: http://nepesseg.com/veszprem/veszprem
  18. Official website of Veszprém (online). Integrált Településfejlesztési Stratégia (Integrated urban development plan). Retrieved from: https://www.veszprem.hu/veszpremieknek/onkormanyzat/strategiak-programok-koncepciok/4489-integralt-telepuelesfejlesztesi-strategia
  19. Official website of Veszprém (online). Veszprémi városrészek (districts of Veszprém). Retrieved from: http://www.veszprem.hu/veszpremieknek/kultura-mveszet/329-veszpremi-varosreszek/5801-veszpremi-varosreszek
  20. Örsi, Á. eds. (1994). Veszprém Guide. Private edition.
  21. Palekiene, O., Simanaviciene, Z., & Bruneckiene, J. (2015). The application of resilience concept in the regional development context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015(213), 179 - 184. Go to original source...
  22. Rácz, K., Koós, B. & Neumark, T. (2006): Social-Economical Relations of Disadvantageous Regions. (In Hungarian language). Space and Society, 20(2), p. 115-141. Go to original source...
  23. Servillo, L., Atkinson, R., & Hamdouch, A. (2017). Small and Medium-Sized Towns in Europe: Conceptual, Methodological and Policy Issues. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 108(4), 365-379. Go to original source...
  24. Shaw, D., & Kidd, S. (2001): Sustainable development and environmental partnership at the regional scale: the case of Sustainability North West. European Environment, 11, 112-123. Go to original source...
  25. Simmie, J., & Martin, R. (2010). The economic resilience of regions: towards and evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2010(3), 27-43. Go to original source...
  26. The Economist Intelligence Unit [EIU] (2019). The Global Liveability Index 2019. A free overview. Retrieved from: http://www.eiu.com/public/thankyou_download.aspx?activity=download&campaignid=liveability2019
  27. Tourinform Veszprém (online). 5+1 reasons to visit Veszprém. Retrieved from: https://veszpreminfo.hu/record/5-1-reasons-to-visit-veszprem
  28. van Dijk, M. P., & Mingshun, Z. (2005). Sustainability indices as a tool for urban managers, evidence from four medium-sized Chinese cities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 25., 667-688. Go to original source...
  29. Yang, Z., Su, M., & Chen, B. (2010). Change of urban ecosystem development - A case study of Beijing, China. Procedia Environmental Sciences, Vol. 2., 681-688. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.