DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2020, 12(2):18-38 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2020.010

How Satisfied Are the Inhabitants of the Balaton Region with Their Settlement?

Hajnalka Fekete-Berzsenyia, Zsuzsanna Banászb
a University of Pannonia, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Accountancy and Controlling, Egyetem u. 10., Veszprém, Hungary, H-8200
b University of Pannonia, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Quantitative Methods, Egyetem u. 10., Veszprém, Hungary, H-8200

Keywords: Balaton region, settlement factors, importance, satisfaction, quantitative analysis

The subject of the study is the satisfaction of the inhabitants of the Lake Balaton tourism development area (Hungary) with the settlement factors, compared to their importance. The research aims to answer the following two research questions. 1) Which settlement factors is the local population most dissatisfied with? 2) How strong is the relationship between the importance and satisfaction with the municipal factors, and the overall satisfaction of the locals with their settlement? The latter may also influence whether locals recommend their settlement or not as a place of residence or a destination for their acquaintances. The data used to answer the research questions are derived from a primary questionnaire survey collected during the years 2018-2019 (the sample element number is 1201 persons). Descriptive statistics and relationship analyses were applied as the method of research. From the differences between the importance of settlement factors and the satisfaction with these factors, decision-makers can infer the use of development resources if they wish to improve the well-being and quality of life of the local population.

Published: July 31, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fekete-Berzsenyi, H., & Banász, Z. (2020). How Satisfied Are the Inhabitants of the Balaton Region with Their Settlement? DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism12(2), 18-38. doi: 10.32725/det.2020.010
Download citation

References

  1. Banász, Z., & Biermann, M. (2019). A Balaton térsége mint élettér I.: demográfia és munkaerőpiac. [In Hungarian, The Lake Balaton area as a living space I.: demography and labour market.] In J.Sulyok, Z.Banász, B.Fehérvölgyi, K.Hiezl, R.Szabó (Eds.), "Mi, balatoniak…" [in Hungarian,"We, the people of Balaton&hellip]. Studies of the Balaton Tourism Research Institute (pp. 70-76). Veszprém: Pannon Egyetemi Kiadó. Retrieved from https://www.gtk.uni-pannon.hu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/batuki_tanulmanykotet_2018_nyomda-v3.pdf
  2. Begg, I. (1999). Cities and competitiveness. Urban studies, 36(5-6), 795-809. Go to original source...
  3. Boley, B. B., McGehee, N. G., & Hammett, A. T. (2017). Importance-performance analysis (IPA) of sustainable tourism initiatives: The resident perspective. Tourism Management, 58, 66-77. Go to original source...
  4. Camagni, R. (2008). Regional Competitiveness: Towards a Concept of Territorial Capital. In R.Capello, R.Camagni, B.Chizzolini, U.Fratesi, (Eds.), Modelling Regional Scenarios for the Enlarged Europe. European Competitiveness and Global Strategies (33-46). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer. Go to original source...
  5. Camagni, R. (2002). On the concept of territorial competitiveness: sound or misleading? Urban Studies 39(13), 2395-2411. Go to original source...
  6. Chen, S. H., Yang, C. C., Lin, W. T., & Yeh, T. M. (2007). Service quality attributes determine improvement priority, The TQM Magazine, 19(2), 162-175. Go to original source...
  7. Cheshire, P. C., & Gordon, R. I. (1996). Territorial competition and the predictability of collective (in)action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 20(3), 383-399. Go to original source...
  8. Dwyer, L., Dragićević, V., Armenski, T., Mihalič, T., & Knežević Cvelbar, L. (2016). Achieving Destination Competitiveness: an Importance-Performance Analysis of Serbia, Current Issues in Tourism, 19(13), 1309-1336. Go to original source...
  9. Fekete-Berzsenyi, H. (2019). A Balaton térsége mint élettér III.: Települési tényezők - fontosság vs. elégedettség. [In Hungarian, The Lake Balaton area as a living space III.: Settlement factors - importance vs. satisfaction]. In J.Sulyok, Z.Banász, B.Fehérvölgyi, K.Hiezl, R.Szabó (Eds.), "Mi, balatoniak…" [In Hungarian, "We, the people of Balaton&hellip]. Studies of the Balaton Tourism Research Institute (pp. 77-82). Veszprém: Pannon Egyetemi Kiadó. Retrieved from https://www.gtk.uni-pannon.hu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/batuki_tanulmanykotet_2018_nyomda-v3.pdf
  10. Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
  11. Gardiner, B., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2004). Competitiveness, productivity, and economic growth across the European regions. Regional Studies, 38(9), 1045-1067. Go to original source...
  12. GOV (2016). 429/2016 (XII. 15.) Korm. rendelet a turisztikai térségek és a kiemelt turisztikai fejlesztési térségek meghatározásáról. [In Hungarian], Government Decree on the definition of tourist areas and priority tourism development areas]. Retrieved from https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=A1600429.KOR&txtreferer=00000001.TXT
  13. HCSO (2020). Guest nights spent in commercial accommodation by tourist region (2016-). Hungarian Central Statistical Office. Retrieved from https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_evkozi/e_oga006a.html
  14. Hernandez, S., Monzon, A., & de Oña, R. (2016). Urban transport interchanges: A methodology for evaluating perceived quality. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 84, 31-43. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.201 Go to original source...
  15. Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS Explained. Second edition. London and New York: Routledge Taylor Francis Group. Go to original source...
  16. Horton, G., & Goers, J. (2019). A Revised Kano Model and its Application in Product Feature Discovery. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332304132_A_Revised_Kano_Model_and_its_Application_in_Product_Feature_Discovery
  17. Insch, A., & Florek, M. (2010). Place satisfaction of city residents: Findings and implications for city branding. In G.Ashworth, M.Kavaratzis (Eds.), Towards effective place brand management: Branding European cities and regions (pp. 191-204). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Go to original source...
  18. Koltai, Z. (2005). A magyarországi városok versenyképességének lakossági megítélése [In Hungarian, Public perception of the competitiveness of Hungarian cities], Tér és Társadalom 19(3-4), 23-41. Go to original source...
  19. Koltai, Z. (2015). Településtípusok lakóhelyi vonzerőinek értékelése [In Hungarian, Evaluation of residential attractions of settlement types]. Földrajzi Közlemények, 139(3), 213-225.
  20. Koltai, Z. (2016). Városok vonzereje országos és regionális léptékben [In Hungarian, Attractiveness of cities on a national and regional scale], In I.Lengyel & B.Nagy (Eds.), Térségek versenyképessége, intelligens szakosodása és újraiparosodása [In Hungarian, Regional competitiveness, smart specialization and re-industrialization] (pp. 272-289). Szeged: JATEPress.
  21. Koltai, Z. (2017). Assessment of the attractions of the residential place in Hungary. Közép-Európai Közlemények, 10(3), 91-106.
  22. Leitner, H., & Sheppard, E. (1998). Economic uncertainty, inter-urban competition and the efficiency of entrepreneurialism. In T.Hal, P. Hubbard (Eds.), The Entrepreneurial City (285-308). Chichester: John Wiley.
  23. Lengyel, I. (2000). A regionális versenyképességről [In Hungarian, On regional competitiveness], Közgazdasági Szemle, 47, 962-987.
  24. Lengyel, I. (2003). Verseny és területi fejlődés: térségek versenyképessége Magyarországon, [In Hungarian, Competition and territorial development: the competitiveness of regions in Hungary], Szeged: JATEPress
  25. Lengyel, I. (2016). A megyék versenyképességének néhány összefüggése a megújult piramismodell alapján [In Hungarian, Some connections of county competitiveness based on the renewed pyramid model], In Lengyel I. - Nagy B. (Eds.), Térségek versenyképessége, intelligens szakosodása és újraiparosodása [In Hungarian, Regional competitiveness, smart specialization and re-industrialization] (pp. 143-161). Szeged: JATEPress.
  26. Lőrincz, K., Lang, L. A., & Banász, Z. (2019). A Balaton régió imázsa és a helyi identitás vizsgálata [In Hungarian,The image of the Balaton region and the examination of the local identity]. In J.Sulyok, Z.Banász, B.Fehérvölgyi, K.Hiezl, R.Szabó (Eds.), "Mi, balatoniak…" [In Hungarian, "We, the people of Balaton&hellip] .Studies of the Balaton Tourism Research Institute (pp. 61-70). Veszprém: Pannon Egyetemi Kiadó. Retrieved from https://www.gtk.uni-pannon.hu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/batuki_tanulmanykotet_2018_nyomda-v3.pdf.
  27. Marien, A. (2012). A sikeres településmarketing kulcsa az elégedett lakosság [In Hungarian, The key to successful settlement marketing is a satisfied population]. In I.Piskóti (Ed.), Marketingkaleidoszkóp [In Hungarian, Marketingkaleidoscope] (pp. 91-96). Miskolc: Miskolci Egyetem Marketing Intézet. Retrieved from http://www.marketing-turizmus.hu/otka/n33.pdf
  28. Marien, A. (2013). A lakossági elégedettség és a helyben maradást magyarázó tényezők összefüggései (In Hungarian, Relationships between population satisfaction and factors explaining staying in place], Marketing & Management, 47(1), 3-10.
  29. Marien, A. (2015). A területi identitás magatartási megnyilvánulásai, különös tekintettel a költözési szándékra [In Hungarian, Behavioral manifestations of territorial identity, in particular the intention to move]. Észak-magyarországi Stratégiai Füzetek, 12(1), 4-16.
  30. Nemes Nagy, J. (1998). A tér a társadalomkutatásban. Ember-település-régió sorozat [In Hungarian, Space in social research. People-settlement-region series]. Budapest: Hilscher Rezső Szociálpolitikai Egyesület.
  31. Nemes Nagy, J. (2016). Mezoterek a társadalomban és a gazdaságban [In Hungarian, Mezospaces in society and the economy], In I.Lengyel & B.Nagy (Eds..), Térségek versenyképessége, intelligens szakosodása és újraiparosodása [In Hungarian, Regional competitiveness, smart specialization and re-industrialization] (pp. 105-124). Szeged: JATEPress.
  32. Nyarku K. M., & Oduro, S. (2017). Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in the Ghanaian Banking Industry. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(7), 532-550. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i7/3120 Go to original source...
  33. Oláh, M. (Ed.) (2013). Balaton Kiemelt Térség Fejlesztési Programja Helyzetértékelés I. Balaton Fejlesztési Tanács [In Hungarian, Balaton Priority Area Development Program Situation Assessment I. Balaton Development Council], Retrieved from https://docplayer.hu/1251182-Balaton-kiemelt-terseg-fejlesztesi-programja.html
  34. Pike, A. J., Champion, A. G., Coombes, M. G., Humphrey, L., & Tomaney, J. (2006). The economic viability and self-containment of geographical economies: a framework for analysis. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
  35. Piskóti, I., Nagy, S., Molnár, L., & Marien, A. (2012). Identification between individuals and places of residence. In Conference Proceedings of Retracing the Silkroad: MAG Scholar Global Business Marketing and Tourism Conference (pp. 1-10). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/soL3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2929245
  36. Piskóti, I., Nagy, S., Dankó, L., Molnár, L., & Marien, A. (2013). Paradigm of the social marketing-theoretical-methodological research. OTKA Research Reports.
  37. Ramirez-Hurtado, J. M. (2017). The use of importance-performance analysis to measure the satisfaction of travel agency franchisees. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(1), 51-64. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020170105 Go to original source...
  38. Pasaribu, P., Waryono, W., & Saputra, R. (2016). Measurement of Visitor's Satisfaction through Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) Method About Servicescape. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 28, 242-244. 1st International Conference on Tourism, Gastronomy, and Tourist Destination (ICTGTD 2016). Atlantis Press. Go to original source...
  39. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73-93. Go to original source...
  40. Rechnitzer, J. (2016). A jövő terei, a tér jövője [In Hungarian, Space of the future, the future of space]. Magyar Tudomány, 177(8), 922-936.
  41. Sajtos, L. & Mitev, A. (2007). SPSS kutatási és adatelemzési kézikönyv [In Hungarian, SPSS Research and Data Analysis Manual]. Budapest: Alinea.
  42. Scott, A. J. (1998). Regions and the World Economy. London: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  43. Szirmai, V. & Váradi, Z. (2009). A várostérségi társadalmak versenyképesség-felfogása. [In Hungarian, Perceptions of the competitiveness of urban societies]. In V.Szirmai (Ed.), A várostérségi versenyképesség társadalmi tényezői [In Hungarian, Social factors of urban competitiveness] (pp. 185-190). Budapest-Pécs: Dialóg Campus.
  44. Tóth-Kaszás, N. (2018). Settlement attachment and Generation Z - an example of a central city in Hungary. Deturope, 10(2), 54-74. Go to original source...
  45. Vaszócsik, V., & Vajdovich-Visy, E. (2017). Integrated land-use models for spatial planning support: country-specific solutions. Deturope, 9(3), 12-28. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.