DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2021, 13(2):13-33 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2021.011

Post-Millennial Visegrád Four Geopolitics: Illiberalism and Positionality within the EU

James Wesley Scott
Karelian Institute, University of Eastern Finland, 80100 Joensuu, Yliopistokatu 2. Finland

This research paper analyses shifts in the Visegrád Group's (Czechia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia) identity as a regional integration platform and, in particular, links between Europeanization, illiberalism and V4 geopolitical identity. This provides a background for investigating contested ideas of European integration that discursively frame Central Europe's 'illiberal regionalism'. I suggest that this regi onalism does not represent a coherent or stable political project. Tensions involved in this regionalist shift are exemplified by 'revolutionary' Hungarian and Polish national conservative agendas and their interaction with the more measured pragmatism of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. This analysis supports the argument that V4 cooperation represents an adjustable geopolitical space that reflects Hungarian and Polish cultural politics of national identity as well as more issue-oriented Czech and Slovak concerns. Moreover, V4 cooperation remains salient in order to prevent the political marginalization of its members.

Keywords: Europeanization, Visegrád Four, Central Europe, Critical Geopolitics, Illiberal Democracy

Published: October 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wesley Scott, J. (2021). Post-Millennial Visegrád Four Geopolitics: Illiberalism and Positionality within the EU. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, 13(2), 13-33. doi: 10.32725/det.2021.011
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ágh, A. (2019). The Neoliberal Hybrid in East-Central Europe. The 'Treason of Intellectuals' and its Current Re-assessment. Politics in Central Europe, 15, 355-381. Go to original source...
    2. Algan, Y., Guriev, S., Papaionnou, E., & Passari E. (2017). The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 309-382. Go to original source...
    3. Balogh, P. (2020). Clashing Geopolitical Self-Images? The Strange Co-Existence of Christian Bulwark and Eurasianism (Turanism) in Hungary. Eurasian geography and economics. Doi:10.1080/15387216.2020.1779772 Go to original source...
    4. Fenko, A. B., Poľgan, J., & Lovec, M. (2019). Crises of the EU and the rise of populism and Euroscepticism in CEE. In Lovec, M. (Ed.), Populism and attitudes towards the EU in Central Europe (pp. 41-70). Ljubljana: University Faculty of Social Sciences.
    5. Barlai, M., & Sik, E. (2017). A Hungarian trademark (a "Hungarikum"): The moral panic button. In Barlai, M., Griessler, C., Fähnrich, B., & Rhomberg, M. (Eds.), The Migrant Crisis: European Perspectives and National discourses (pp. 147-168). Zürich: LIT Verlag.
    6. Bibó, I. (1946). A kelet-európai kisállamok nyomorúsága [The Misery of Eastern European Small States]. Budapest: Szikra Irodalmi és Lapkiadó Vállalat.
    7. Boros, T. (2016). Hungary: The Country of the Pro-European People and a Eurosceptic Government. Truth About Lies on Europe blog, http://trulies-europe.de/?p=374 (Accessed 08 January 2020).
    8. Boros, T. (2017). Hungary and the Visegrad Four. In Skrzypek, A., & Skóra, M. (Eds.), The Future of the Visegrad Group (pp. 13-17).
    9. Buckley, N. & Foy, H. (2016). Visegrad Four: the EU's Eastern Critics. Financial Times, 29 August 2016.
    10. Buhari-Gulmez, D., & Rumford, C. (2016). Towards a ("thick", "thin", or "parallel") European Society? Understanding the Dynamics of European Multiplicity. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29, 41-55, DOI:10.1080/13511610.2015.1055457 Go to original source...
    11. Bunikowski, D. (2018). The Constitutional Crisis in Poland, Schmittian Questions and Kaczyński's Political and Legal Philosophy. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26, 285-307. DOI:10.1080/14782804.2018.1498771 Go to original source...
    12. Butler, E. (2017). The 'in Defense of National Identity' Argument: Comparing the UK and Hungarian Referendums of 2016. Europe Now, 2017(4), 01 Feb.
    13. Buzogány, A. & Varga, M. (2018). The Ideational Foundations of the Illiberal Backlash in Central and Eastern Europe: the Case of Hungary. Review of International Political Economy, 25, 811-828. DOI:10.1080/09692290.2018.1543718 Go to original source...
    14. Cabada, L. (2018). The Visegrad Cooperation in the Context of Other Central European Cooperation Formats. Politics in Central Europe, 14, 165-179. Go to original source...
    15. Calhoun, C. (2007). Nations Matter: Culture, History and the Cosmopolitan Dream. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
    16. Celata, F., & Coletti, R. (2019). Borderscapes of External Europeanization in the Mediterranean Neighbourhood. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26, 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776417717309 Go to original source...
    17. Chelcea, L., & Druţǎ, O. (2016). Zombie Socialism and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57, 521-544. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2016.1266273 Go to original source...
    18. Chernobrov, D. (2016). Ontological Security and Public (Mis)recognition of International Crises: Uncertainty, Political Imagining, and the Self. Political Psychology, 37, 581-596. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12334 Go to original source...
    19. Cichocki, P. (2017). Cosmopolitanism In The Face Of Populism - Contemporary Challenges On The Path Of European Identity Formation. Society Register, 1, 67-74. https://doi.org/10.14746/sr.2017.1.1.06 Go to original source...
    20. Della Sala, V. (2016). Europe's Odyssey?: Political mMth and the European Union. Nations and Nationalism, 22, 524-541. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12159 Go to original source...
    21. Della Sala, V. (2018). Expert Comment. The EU and hegemony: The New Medievalism Revisited. Dialogue of Civilizations Research Institute, https://doc-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Della-Sala_Europe-and-hegemony_Download-file.pdf
    22. Dostál, V. (2019). The 'Hungarization' of the Visegrad Group is harmful to the rest of Central Europe. https://www.amo.cz/en/the-hungarization-of-the-visegrad-group-is-harmful-to-the-rest-of-central-europe/
    23. Drulák, P. (2006). Between Geopolitics and Anti-Geopolitics: Czech Political Thought. Geopolitics, 11, 420-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040600767883 Go to original source...
    24. Dutka, J. (2016). Wpływ realizacji geopolitycznej koncepcji Międzymorza na bezpieczeństwo militarne Polski i Europy Wschodniej w XXI wieku [The impact of the geopolitical concept of Międzymorze on Poland's military security towards Eastern Europe in the 21st century]. Przeglad Geopolityczny, 16, 120-137.
    25. Gabrizová, Z. (2018). Slovak state secretary: I am a strong advocate for a communitarian EU." Euractiv.sk, 1 March 2018. https://www.euractiv.com/section/future-eu/interview/slovak-state-secretary-i-am-a-strong-advocate-for-a-communitarian-eu/ (Accessed 2 February 2019).
    26. Gabrizová, Z. (2020). Hungary misappropriated V4 brand, says Slovak justice minister. 5 November 2020. https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/hungary-misappropriated-v4-brand-says-slovak-justice-minister/ (Accessed 03 May 2021).
    27. Geist, R. (2017). Slovakia: Squaring the Visegrad Circle. In Skrzypek, A. & Skóra, M. (Eds.) The Future of the Visegrad Group (pp. 23-28.) Brussels/Berlin: Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Das Progressive Zentrum.
    28. Gotev, G. (2017). Visegrád Group Spells out its Vision of EU's Guture. Euractiv, 3 March 2017, https://www.euractiv.com/section/central-europe/news/visegrad-group-spells-out-its-vision-of-eus-future/
    29. Hajdú, Z. (2019). The Rebirth of the Concept of the Carpathian Basin in Hungarian Political Language after 1988. In Laine, J., Liikanen, I., & Scott, J. W. (Eds.), Post-Cold War Borders. Reframing Political Space in Eastern Europe (pp. 207-227). Milton Park and New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
    30. Hanley, S. & Vachudova, M. A. (2018). Understanding the illiberal turn: democratic backsliding in the Czech Republic. East European Politics, 34, 276-296. DOI:10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457 Go to original source...
    31. Havlík, V. (2019). Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe. Problems of Post-Communism, 66, 369-384. DOI:10.1080/10758216.2019.1580590 Go to original source...
    32. Havlík, V., & Storajová, V. (2018). Different Faces of Illiberal Party Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. In Solska, M., Bieber, F., & Taleski, D. (Eds.), Illiberal and Authoritarian Tendencies in Central, Southeastern and Eastern Europe (pp. 313-342). Bern: Peter Lang.
    33. Hungarian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 'Hungary's External Relations Strategy. Unofficial Translation' (Budapest: Government of Hungary 2014), www.mfa.gov.hu/NR/rdonlyres/3E8FA370-15B3.../080319_kulkapcs_strat_en.pdf (Accessed 12 June 2017).
    34. Iątok, R., Kozárová, I., & Polačková, A. (2018). The Intermarium as a Polish Geopolitical Concept in history and in the Present. Geopolitics. DOI:10.1080/14650045.2018.1551206 Go to original source...
    35. Jančoąekovà, V. (2017). Regional Cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe and its Implications for the EU. European View, 16,: 231-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0460-8 Go to original source...
    36. Kaufmann, S. (2019). Le Monde 28/29 July 2019, Sylvie Kaufmann (interviewer) "La question migratoire est le problème de toute l' UE".
    37. Kazharski, A. (2018). The End of 'Central Europe'? The Rise of the Radical Right and the Contestation of Identities in Slovakia and the Visegrad Four. Geopolitics, (23)4, 754-780. DOI:10.1080/14650045.2017.1389720 Go to original source...
    38. Kazharski, A. (2019). Two kinds of small? The 'EU core' in Slovak and Czech geopolitical imagination. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 27(4), 424-438. DOI:10.1080/14782804.2019.1598340 Go to original source...
    39. Klus, A. (2015). What Makes the Visegrad Group so Geopolitically Fragile? New Eastern Europe, 05 June. http://neweasterneurope.eu/old_site/articles-and-commentary/1617-what-makes-the-visegrad-group-so-geopolitically-fragile
    40. Kováts, E., & Smejkalova, K. (2019). The EU's ongoing East-West divide: How the West's economic exploitation and moral arrogance fuel right-wing populism in East-Central Europe. International Politics and Society, 03.07.2019, https://www.ips-journal.eu/regions/europe/article/show/the-eus-ongoing-east-west-divide-3575/
    41. Krastev, I. (2017). After Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Go to original source...
    42. Krastev, I., & Holmes, S. (2018). Explaining Eastern Europe: Imitation and Its Discontents. Journal of Democracy, 29(3), 17-28. Go to original source...
    43. Krastev, I., & Holmes, S. (2019). The Light that Failed. A Reckoning, London: Allen Lane.
    44. Krasteva, A. (2017). If Borders Did Not Exist, Euroscepticism Would Have Invented Them Or, on Post-Communist Re/De/Re/Bordering in Bulgaria. Geopolitics, 25(3), 678-705. DOI:10.1080/14650045.2017.1398142 Go to original source...
    45. Kuus, M. (2007). Inscribing Europeanness, Erasing Eastness. In. Geopolitics Reframed. New Visions in Security. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
    46. Lebow, K., Mazurek, M., & Wawrzyniak, J. (2019). Making Modern Social Science: The Global Imagination in East Central and Southeastern Europe after Versailles. Contemporary European History, 28 (2), 137-42. Go to original source...
    47. Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12, 341-370. DOI:10.1177/1354066106067346. Go to original source...
    48. Kinnvall, C., & Mitzen, J. (2017). An Introduction to the Special Issue: Ontological Securities in World Politics. Cooperation and Conflict, 52, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653162 Go to original source...
    49. McEnchroe, T. (2019). 15 Years after Accession - What is the Deal with Czech Euroscepticism? 01 May 2019, Radio CZ, https://www.radio.cz/en/section/panorama/15-years-after-accession-what-is-the-deal-with-czech-euroscepticism.
    50. Mälksoo, M. (2010). The Politics of Becoming European: A Study of Polish and Baltic Post-cold War Security Imaginaries. London: Routledge.
    51. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic 2019 Programme for the Czech Presidency of the Visegrad Group 2019/2020 "V 4 Reasonable Europe". https://www.mzv.cz/file/3626458/Programme_CZ_V4_PRES_2019_2020_A.pdf (Accessed 20 February 2020).
    52. Mogildea, M. (2018). The Visegrad Group: a regional integration model for advancing the Europeanization process in Central and Eastern Europe. Fellowship Policy Papers, Think Visegrad - V4 Think Tank Platform, https://think.visegradfund.org/fellowship-papers/
    53. Nagy, E. & Nagy G. (2013). The layers of dependence and the changing role of the state - Conceptualising urban change in the East of Europe. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität http://www.rc21.org/conferences/berlin2013/RC21-Berlin-Papers-3/03_2_enagy_gnagy.pdf
    54. Natorski, M. (2015). Epistemic (Un)certainty in Times of Crisis: the Role of Coherence as a Social Convention in the European Neighbourhood Policy after the Arab Spring. European Journal of International Relations, 22, 646-670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115599043 Go to original source...
    55. Neuman, M. (2017). The Visegrád Group as a Vehicle for Promoting National Interests in the European Union: The Case of the Czech Republic. Politics in Central Europe, 13(1), 55-67. Go to original source...
    56. Nič, M. (2016). The Visegrád Group in the EU: 2016 as a Turning-Point? European View 15: 281-290. DOI:10.1007/s12290-016-0422-6 Go to original source...
    57. Novotná, T., & Stuchlíková, Z. (2017). Czechia: From a V4-Enthusiast to a V4-Sceptic and Back Again. In Skrzypek, A., & Skóra, M. (Eds.), The Future of the Visegrad Group (pp. 6-12). Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Das Progressive Zentrum, https://www.progressives-zentrum.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/The-Future-of-the-Visegrad-Group_2018_ebook.pdf
    58. Nyyssönen, H. (2018). The East is different, isn't it? - Poland and Hungary in search of prestige." Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(3), 258-269. DOI:10.1080/14782804.2018.1498772 Go to original source...
    59. Ochman, K., Zbytniewska, K., & Plevák, O. (2018). The awkward squad: Czech-Polish cooperation on a different EU vision. Euractiv.cz and Euractiv.pl, 8 October 2018, https://www.euractiv.com/section/future-eu/news/the-awkward-squad-czech-polish-cooperation-on-a-different-eu-vision/ (Accessed 2 February 2019).
    60. Pakulski, J. (2016). Conclusions. In Pakulski, J. (Ed.), The Visegrad Countries in Crisis pp. 122-127). Warsaw: Collegium Civitas.
    61. Palonen, E. (2018). Performing the Nation: the Janus-Faced Populist Foundations of Illiberalism in Hungary. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26, 308-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2018.1498776 Go to original source...
    62. Pisciotta, B. (2016). The Center-Periphery Cleavage Revisited: East and Central Europe from Postcommunism to Euroscepticism. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 22, 193-221. Go to original source...
    63. Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2017). Polish Foreign Policy Strategy, 2017-2021
    64. Racz, A. (2014). The Visegrad Cooperation: Central Europe Divided Over Russia. L'Europe en Formation, 374, 61-76. DOI:10.3917/eufor.374.0061 Go to original source...
    65. Republic of Hungary (2011). Fundamental Law of Hungary, 25 April 2011. (English translation of consolidated version of 1 October 2013) available at http://www.kormany.hu/en/news/the-new-fundamental-law-of-hungary
    66. Richardson, P. (2018). Geopolitical cultures, pragmatic patriotism, and Russia's disputed islands. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 59(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2017.1421474 Go to original source...
    67. Rumelili, B. (2014). Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security. Peace Anxieties. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
    68. Rumelili, B. (2018). Breaking with Europe's pasts: memory, reconciliation, and ontological (In)security. European Security, 27(3), 280-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2018.1497979 Go to original source...
    69. Sarka, S. (2016). Ellen kell állni. A brüsszeli bürokrátak nem a nemzeti érdekeket képviselik [We must resist. Brussels bureaucrats do not represent national interests]. Magyar Demokrata, XXI/11 (16 March 2017), pp. 10-12.
    70. Schmidt, A. (2016). Friends forever? The Role of the Visegrad Group and European Integration. Politics in Central Europe, 12(3), 113-140. Go to original source...
    71. Schöpflin, G. (2000). Nations, Identity, Power. New York: New York University Press.
    72. Scott, J. W. (2017). Extreme and Extremist Geographies: Commentary on the Revanchist Impulse and its Consequences for Everyday Bordering. Fennia - International Journal of Geography, 195, 102-105. Go to original source...
    73. Scott, J. W. (2020). Hungarian Border Politics as an Anti-politics of the European Union. Geopolitics, 25(3), 658-677, DOI:10.1080/14650045.2018.1548438 Go to original source...
    74. Slovakian Spectator (2020). Slovakia does not buy into defining an alternative to the rule of law with Hungary, https://spectator.sme.sk/c/22529378/slovakia-does-not-buy-into-defining-an-alternative-to-the-rule-of-law-with-hungary.html, access 10 April 2021
    75. Smith, A. D. (2009). Ethno-symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach. Milton Park: Routledge.
    76. Stormowska, M., & Dufour, N. (2016). Poland: All Shades of EU Enthusiasm. In Pertusot, V. (Ed.), The European Union in the Fog: Building Bridges between National Perspectives on the European Union (pp. 169-175). Paris: Institut français des Relations Internationales.
    77. Szalai, M., Csornai, Z., & Garai, N. (2017). V4 Migration Policy: Conflicting Narratives and Interpretive Frameworks. In Morillas, P. (Ed.), Illiberal Democracies in the EU: the Visegrad Group and the Risk of Disintegration (pp. 19-30). Barcelona: Colección Monografías CEDOB.
    78. Szomolányi, S., & Gál, Zs. (2016). Slovakia's Elite: Between Populism and Compliance with EU Elites. In Pakulski, J. (Ed.), The Visegrad Countries in Crisis, Chapter 4, 67-86, Warsaw: Collegium Civitas.
    79. Törő, C., Butler, E. & Grúber, K. (2014). Visegrád: The Evolving Pattern of Coordination and Partnership After EU Enlargement." Europe-Asia Studies, 66, 364-393, DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2013.855392 Go to original source...
    80. Trencsényi, B. (2017). Central Europe. In Mishkova, D., & B. Trencsényi, B. (Eds.): European Regions and Boundaries: A Conceptual History (pp. 166-187). New York: Berghahn. Go to original source...
    81. Varró, K. (2008). Changing Narratives on EU Multi-level Space in a Globalizing Era: How Hungary as a National Space became Part of the Story. European Planning Studies, 16(7), 955-969. DOI:10.1080/09654310802163751 Go to original source...
    82. Vertovec, S. (2011). The Cultural Politics of Nation and Migration." Annual Review of Anthropology, 40, 241-256. Go to original source...
    83. Vieira, M. (2016). Understanding Resilience in International Relations: The Non-Aligned Movement and Ontological Security. International Studies Review, 18, 290-311, https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viw002 Go to original source...
    84. Vliegenthart, A. (2010). Bringing Dependency Back. In The Economic Crisis in Post-socialist Europe and the Continued Relevance of Dependent Development. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 35, 242-265. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/20762458
    85. Whittaker, N. (2018). The Island Race: Ontological Security and Critical Geopolitics in British Parliamentary Discourse. Geopolitics, 23, 954-985, DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2017.1390743 Go to original source...
    86. Wilkin, P. (2016). Hungary's Crisis of Democracy: The Road to Serfdom. Lanham: Lexington Books,
    87. Zachová, A., Zgut, E., Zbytniewska, K., Strzałkowski, M, & Gabrizova, Z. (2018). Visegrad Nations United Against Mandatory Relocation Quotas. Euractiv, 23 June 2018. https://www.euractiv.com/section/justice-home-affairs/news/visegrad-nations-united-against-mandatory-relocation-quotas/
    88. Zaj±c, J. (2018). Polish Perception of Security Threats and Challenges of the 21st Century. In Jankowski, B., & Zima, A. (Eds.): France and Poland Facing the Evolution of the Environment (pp. 17-26). Études de l'IRSEM, 59.
    89. Zarycki, T. (2014). Ideologies of Eastness in Central and Eastern Europe. Milton Park: Routledge.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content