DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2021, 13(2):66-100 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2021.014

Cohesion policy challenges and discovery in 2021-2027. The case of Hungary

Pál Szabóa, Viktória Józsab, Tamás Gordosa
a ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, Department of Regional Science
b Nord Consult Ltd.

With the political agreement by the European Parliament and the Council on the Commission's proposal for 2021-2027 on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Cohesion Fund (CF) and the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes ("Interreg"), and all the other instruments related to cohesion policy, we have entered the final stage of the provisions for the new EU programming period: the final approval of the legal texts (EC, 2020a).
Thus, the main objective of our study is to present the most important challenges at the Member State level (Hungary) with a bottom-up and practice-oriented perspective. Methodologically, three specific factors were identified and studied in the paper that constitute significant challenge for national level policymaking, as follows: (1) as regards the soci(et)al aspect, the questions of the new "regions" (Central Hungary vs Budapest and Pest region); (2) regarding the economic aspect, the newly created territorial "units" (Economic Development Zones); and lastly (3) as a nature-focused aspect, the management of surface water.
These factors are directly connected to the five investment priorities of the EU for 2021 -2027 i.e. Smarter, Greener and carbon free, Connected, and Social Europe that is Closer to its citizens (EC, 2018) and represent criteria that reflect the reality on the ground. These factors were examined in specific case studies exploring their relations to national and interregional policymaking and EU level policies also, together with their presence in the planned programming documents, e.g. the Operational Programmes and Partnership Agreement. As a result, we aim to identify some direct causal relations between policy and practice, highlight some synergies (or their absence) between national and interregional level sectoral (horizontal) and EU-Member State level (vertical) processes, and additionally, shed some light on the possible future scenarios in these specific and important areas. Through these outcomes, our research could contribute to a more tailored approach to regional development, that is a major objective of the New Cohesion Policy.

Keywords: EU Cohesion Policy, 2021-2027, territorial development, Hungary

Published: October 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Szabó, P., Józsa, V., & Gordos, T. (2021). Cohesion policy challenges and discovery in 2021-2027. The case of Hungary. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, 13(2), 66-100. doi: 10.32725/det.2021.014
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bachtler, M., & Wostner, Z. (2019). Towards Cohesion Policy 4.0. Regional Studies Impact Books. OECD, RSA. Go to original source...
    2. Berkes, J. (2020). The Economic Structure and Performance of the Catchment Area of the Hungarian Regional Centers. Deturope, 12 (3), 58-81. Go to original source...
    3. BM (Ministry of Interior, Hungary) (2017). Kvassay Jenő Plan. https://www.vizugy.hu/index.php?module=vizstrat≺ogramelemid=143 (Downloaded: May 20, 2021).
    4. Crescenzi, R., Fratesi, U., & Monastiriotis, V. (2020). Back to the member states? Cohesion Policy and the national Challenges to the European Union. Regional Studies, 54(1), 5-9. Go to original source...
    5. C(2020) 6769 Decision of the European Commission on 7 October 2020) about the extension of the Hungarian regional state aid map until 31 December 2021.
    6. EC (2018): Regional Development and Cohesion Policy 2021-2027. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2018/06/06-08-2018-regional-development-and-cohesion-policy-2021-2027 (Downloaded: July 10, 2021)
    7. EC (2020a). New Cohesion Policy. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/2021_2027/#1 (downloaded: October 10, 2021).
    8. EC (2020b): Priorities for 2021-2027. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/hu/policy/how/priorities (Downloaded: October 5, 2021).
    9. EC (2000c): EU Water Framework Directive. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32000L0060&from=EN (Downloaded: May 15, 2021).
    10. EC (2021a). Environment. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/index_en (Downloaded: May 21, 2021)
    11. EC (2021b). Macroregional Strategies; European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/macro-regional-strategies (Downloaded: May 20, 2021)
    12. EC (2021c). A European Green Deal. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en (Downloaded: May 25, 2021)
    13. Fiaschi, D., Lavezzi, A. M., & Parenti, A. (2018). Does EU cohesion policy work? Theory and evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 58(2), 386-423. Go to original source...
    14. Gál, Z., Lux, G., & Illés, I. (2013). (Eds.) Danube Region: Analysis and Long-Term Development Trends of the Macro-Region. Pécs, Institute of Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
    15. Józsa, V. (2020). Miskolc - A Central and Eastern European City in the Crossroads. Deturope, 12(3), 82-107. Go to original source...
    16. Megyesi, Z., & Péti, M. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of the Socio-Economic Development of Romanian Cities and Towns Inhabited by Ethnic Hungarians. Deturope, 11(3), 205-228. Go to original source...
    17. MIT (Ministry for Innovation and Technology) (2020). Evaluation of Integrated Territorial Implementation. https://www.palyazat.gov.hu/az-integrlt-terleti-vgrehajts-rtkelse
    18. Nemes Nagy, J. & Tagai, G. (2009). Területi egyenlőtlenségek, térszerkezeti determinációk. Területi Statisztika, 12 (49), 152-169.
    19. OFTK (2014). National Development 2030 - National Development and Territorial Development Concept. Hungarian Official Journal Volume 2014. Issue No. 1.: Parliament Resolution No. 1/2014. (I. 3.) OGY National Development 2030 - National Development and Territorial Development Concept.
    20. Nyikos, Gy. & Soós, G. (2020). The Hungarian Experience of Using Cohesion Policy Funds and Prospects. In Musiałkowska, I., Idczak P. & Potluka, O. (Ed.), Successes & Failures in EU Cohesion Policy: An Introduction to EU cohesion policy in Eastern, Central, and Southern Europe. De Gruyter Open Poland. Doi:10.1515/9788395720451-007 Go to original source...
    21. OGY (1996). The Act XXI of 1996 on Regional Development and Regional Planning (IV.5.) https://net.jogtar.hu/jogszabaly?docid=99600021.tv
    22. PA (2014). Partnership Agreement of Hungary. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/partnership-agreement-hungary-2014-20_hu (Downloaded: July 12, 2021)
    23. PA (2021). Partnership Agreement of Hungary. (May 12. 2021.) https://www.palyazat.gov.hu/partnersegi-megallapodas (Downloaded: July 12, 2021).
    24. Parliament Resolution (2020a). A Kormány 1566/2020. (IX. 4.) Korm. határozata az Északkelet-magyarországi Gazdaságfejlesztési Zóna komplex fejlesztéséért felelős kormánybiztos kinevezéséről és feladatairól; Magyar Közlöny, 201. (2020. szeptember 4.) https://magyarkozlony.hu (Downloaded: September 14, 2021).
    25. Parliament Resolution (2020b). A Kormány 1567/2020. (IX. 4.) Korm. határozata az Északnyugat-magyarországi Gazdaságfejlesztési Zóna komplex fejlesztéséért felelős kormánybiztos kinevezéséről és feladatairól; Magyar Közlöny, 201. (2020. szeptember 4.) https://magyarkozlony.hu (Downloaded: September 14, 2021)
    26. Parliament Resolution (2020c). A Kormány 1568/2020. (IX. 4.) Korm. határozata a Dél-alföldi Gazdaságfejlesztési Zóna komplex fejlesztéséért felelős kormánybiztos kinevezéséről és feladatairól; Magyar Közlöny, 201. (2020. szeptember 4.); https://magyarkozlony.hu (Downloaded: September 14, 2021)
    27. Parliament Resolution (2020d). A Kormány 1569/2020. (IX. 4.) Korm. határozata a Dél-dunántúli Gazdaságfejlesztési Zóna komplex fejlesztéséért felelős kormánybiztos kinevezéséről és feladatairól; Magyar Közlöny, 201. (2020. szeptember 4.); https://magyarkozlony.hu (Downloaded: September 14, 2021)
    28. Pest County Development Concept 2030, revised version, 2021. http://www.pestmegye.hu/dokumentumok-teruletfejlesztes/4399-pest-megyei-teruletfejlesztesi-koncepcio-2030-felulvizsgalt-valtozat (Downloaded: November 10, 2021).
    29. Pénzes, J. (2014). Periférikus térségek lehatárolása - dilemmák és lehetőségek. Debrecen: Didakt Kft.
    30. Rácz, Sz. (2019). Development Processes of Regional Centres in Central and Southeast Europe - From State Socialism to Dependent Market Economies. Deturope, 11(2), 92-100. Go to original source...
    31. Rechnitzer, J., Berkes, J. & Filep, J. (2019). The most important city development initiatives of Hungary. Regional Statistics, 9(2), 20-44. Doi:10.15196/RS090204 Go to original source...
    32. Revised Regional Aid Guidelines (RAG) accepted on 16 September 2021 by the European Commission, including the Hungarian regional aid map for 2022-2027.
    33. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Dijkstra, L. (2020). Does Cohesion Policy reduce EU discontent and Euroscepticism? Working Paper, Research and indicators produced by the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, WP 04/2020, p28.
    34. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Dijkstra, L. (2021). Does Cohesion Policy reduce EU discontent and Euroscepticism? Regional Studies, 55(1), 354-369. Go to original source...
    35. Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Novak, K. (2013). Learning processes and economic returns in European Cohesion Policy, Investigaciones Regionales, 25, 7-26.
    36. Szabó, P. (2017). Makroregionális szemlélet az Európai Unió regionális politikai dokumentumaiban. In Szónokyné Ancsin, G. (Ed.), Magyarok a Kárpát-medencében 2. (pp. 485-497). Szeged: Egyesület Közép-Európa Kutatására.
    37. Szilágyi, J. (2019). Systematization and some current issues of water law and water regulation in the framework of the European Union. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Law, 14 (26), 255-275. Go to original source...
    38. UN (2015). 17 Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/water-and-sanitation (Downloaded: May 20, 2021).

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content