DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2021, 13(2):125-138 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2021.016

Tackling the measurement of cross-border cooperation intensity: an empirical example on the Hungary-Croatia border

Zoltán Pámer
Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Institute for Regional Studies, H-7621 Pécs, Papnövelde u. 22

Although cross-border cooperation has traditionally been treated as a research issue of geopolitics and governance, use of data from European Union (EU) funded Interreg programmes opened up opportunities for comparative and in-depth analysis. The importance of Interreg programmes, as instruments of the European Territorial Cooperation goal, has been constantly on the rise since its inception as INTERREG Community Initiative, then becoming part of the cohesion policy mainstream in 2007. In the 2021 -2027 programming period, for first time since its setup, Interreg has received lower funding, which requires a higher stress on cooperation and thematic concentration. When defining funding priorities of programmes, besides "general" factors (development needs, stakeholders' preferences, regulation constraints), the cross - border factor - i.e. how projects contribute to cooperation as such - should be also taken into consideration. Therefore, allocation should prefer thematic areas (priorities) where cooperation is likely to be more intensive. Intensity of cooperation, as a composite indicator, may be generated from various parameters that may be measured in case of implemented projects, on the basis of Interreg programme data.
The paper aims to provide a simple yet transparent methodology on how the intensity of cross-border cooperation may be measured and how different thematic areas may be ranked in terms of their contribution to cooperation. The first part of the study presents an overview of 'border studies' from different aspects and the selected target area concerned. It is followed by a summary of the evolution of European Territorial Cooperation, highlighting the main milestones and particularities of the regulation for the 2021-2027 programming period. The following part lays down the applied methodology: composition of cross-border cooperation intensity indicator and the five sub-indicators. The results are presented through the example of projects financed by the Interreg V-A Hungary-Croatia Cooperation Programme 2014-2020. The final part of the paper summarises the lessons learned and their replicability.

Keywords: cohesion policy, cross-border cooperation, cooperation intensity, Hungary, Croatia

Published: October 1, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pámer, Z. (2021). Tackling the measurement of cross-border cooperation intensity: an empirical example on the Hungary-Croatia border. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, 13(2), 125-138. doi: 10.32725/det.2021.016
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. AEBR (1997). The EU Initiative INTERREG and future developments. Association of European Border Regions. Retrieved July 16, 2018, from https://www.aebr.eu/files/publications/interreg_97.en.pdf
    2. Bali, L. (2012). A horvát-magyar határon átnyúló kapcsolatok jelene és jövője. Budapest-Szepetnek: Underground Kiadó.
    3. Csapó, J., Čelan, T. J., & Trócsányi, A. (2015). A határmenti együttműködés hatásai a területi fejlődésre a magyar-horvát szakasz példáján az EU tervezési mechanizmusának tükrében (2007-2013) [Impacts of cooperation in border areas on territorial development on example of the Hungary-Croatia border area, in light of the EU planning mechanism (2007-2013)]. Területfejlesztés és Innováció, 9(2), 22-31.
    4. Dołzbłasz, S. (2018). A network approach to transborder cooperation studies as exemplified by Poland's eastern border. Geographia Polonica, 91(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.0091 Go to original source...
    5. Döbrönte, K. (2018). The impact of locational strategies of advanced producer service firms on the metropole cities' economic positions in Central Europe. Deturope, 10(3), 70-89. Go to original source...
    6. EC (2021a). Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy.
    7. EC (2021b). Regulation (EU) 2021/1058 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 on the European Regional Development Fund and on the Cohesion Fund.
    8. EC (2021c). Regulation (EU) 2021/1059 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 on specific provisions for the European territorial cooperation goal (Interreg) supported by the European Regional Development Fund and external financing instruments.
    9. ESPON (2010). Metroborder - Cross-border polycentric Metropolitan Regions. Targeted Analysis 2013/2/3. Final Report. ESPON & University of Luxembourg.
    10. Fekete, D. (2020). A magyar határ menti nagyvárosok határon átnyúló kormányzásának vizsgálata az EGTC-kben és INTERREG-projektekben betöltött szerepük alapján [Governance characteristics of big cities in border regions of Hungary based on their role in EGTCs and INTERREG projects]. Tér és Társadalom, 34(3), 224-243. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.34.3.3190 Go to original source...
    11. Harguindéguy, J.-B., & Bray, Z. (2009). Does cross-border cooperation empower European regions? The case of INTERREG III-A France - Spain. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27, 747-760. Go to original source...
    12. INTERACT (2015). Fact Sheet; Historical view of Interreg / European Territorial Cooperation. Retrieved July 16, 2018, from www.interact-eu.net/download/ file/fid/2902
    13. Interact (2019). Territorial approach post 2020. Input to Transitioning. 09-10 December 2019, Frankfurt/Main, DE, Bernard Schausberger. Retrieved January 21, 2021, from http://www.interact-eu.net/download/file/fid/18497.
    14. Kolossov, V. A. (2015). Theoretical approaches in the study of borders. In Sevastianov, S. V., Laine, J. P., & Kireev, A. A. (eds.): Introduction to Border Studies. Far Eastern Federal University, Dalnauka, Vladivostok.
    15. Lados, M. (2005). Programértékelés a 2000. évi Magyarország-Ausztria Phare CBC Kisprojekt Alap példáján [Programme evaluation on example of the year 2000 Hungary-Austria Phare CBC Small Project Fund]. Tér és Társadalom, 19(2), 101-126. Go to original source...
    16. Martinez, O. J. (1994). The Dynamics of Border Interaction: New Approaches to Border Analysis. In Schofield, C. H. (Ed.): World Boundaries. Volume I Global Boundaries (pp. 1-15). London, New York. Routledge.
    17. Nagy, I. (2020). Cross-border cooperation on the external borders of the EU and the impact of the received EU CBC funds on AP Vojvodina/Serbia. Belgeo, 2. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.38732 Go to original source...
    18. Nemes Nagy, J. (1998). A tér a társadalomkutatásban. Budapest: Hilscher Rezső Szociálpolitikai Egyesület.
    19. Pámer, Z. (2011). The possibilities of implementing the European Grouping of the Territorial Cooperation in South Transdanubia. In Ágh A., Kaiser T., & Koller B. (Eds.): The New Horizons of the Cohesion Policy in the European Union: the Challenge of the Danube Strategy (pp. 176-194). Budapest: Blue Ribbon Research Centre King Sigismund College.
    20. Pámer, Z. (2019a). A területi kormányzási struktúrák hatása a határon átnyúló együttműködésre - négy határrégió összehasonlító elemzése. Pécs: PTE Közgazdaságtudományi Kar Regionális Politika és Gazdaságtan Doktori Iskola. http://hdl.handle.net/11155/2078
    21. Pámer, Z. (2019b). How governance counts? Comparative analysis of activity and funding patterns of Central European Cross-border Cooperation Programmes. EUROPA XXI, 35, 111-126. http://doi.org/10.7.7163/Eu21.2018.35.7 Go to original source...
    22. Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border Regions in Europe. Significance and Drivers of Regional Cross-border Cooperation. European Urban and Regional Studies,10(2), 153-171. SAGE Publications. Go to original source...
    23. Perkmann, M. (2007). Policy entrepreneurship and multilevel governance: a comparative study of European cross-border regions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, 861-879. Go to original source...
    24. Popescu, G. (2008). The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: Geopolitics of Euroregions in Eastern Europe. Political Geography, 27, 418-438. Go to original source...
    25. Rácz, Sz. (2017). Main characteristics of Hungarian-Croatian political relations and Cross-Border Co-operations. Geographica Pannonica, 21(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.18421/GP21.01-05 Go to original source...
    26. Rácz, Sz. (2019). Development Processes of Regional Centres in Central and Southeast Europe - From State Socialism to Dependent Market Economies. Deturope, 11(2), 92-100. Go to original source...
    27. Scott, J. W. (2013). Territorial Cohesion, Cross-border Co-operation and the EU's Political Identity: A Brief Observation. In Pálné Kovács, I., Scott, J., & Gál, Z. (Eds.), Territorial Cohesion in Europe - For the 70th anniversary of the Transdanubian Research Institute (pp. 73-84). Pécs: Institute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
    28. Scott, J. W. (2015). Bordering, Border Politics and Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe. In Celata, F., & Coletti, R. (Eds.). Neighbourhood Policy and the Construction of the European External Borders, GeoJournal Library 115, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-18452-4_2. Go to original source...
    29. Scott, J. W., & Liikanen, I. (2010). Civil Society and the 'Neighbourhood' - Europeanization through Cross-Border Cooperation? In Scott, J. W., & Liikanen, I. (Eds.), European Neighbourhood through Civil Society Networks? London: Routledge. Go to original source...
    30. Uszkai, A. (2015). Measurement levels of the spatial integration - Suggestion for a Central-European Factor Group. Deturope, 7(2), 65-80. Go to original source...
    31. Zimmermann, F. M., & Kubik, K. (2003). Grenzüberschreitende Kooperationen: Der Raum Graz - Maribor [Cross-border cooperation: the Graz - Maribor area]. Ländlicher Raum 3/2003. Retrieved March 10, 2016, from https://www.bmlfuw.gv.at/dam/jcr:f5e2c70d-7507-44dd-bba5-6254351bd795/Zimmermann_end2%5B1%5D.pdf.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content