DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2022, 14(1):29-49 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2022.002

Elements of Endogenous Development in the Regions of Visegrad Countries

Gábor Bodnára, Péter Kovácsa, Zoltán Egrib
a University of Szeged, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, H-6722 Szeged, Kálvária sgt. 1
b Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Institute of Sustainable Development and Farming, H-5540 Szarvas, Szabadság u. 1-3

Understanding territorial processes has come to the focus of relevant enquiries in the past few decades but it is especially important in the case of less favoured areas. In this particular research project presented here, the major factors of endogenous development and their presence in the regions of Visegrad countries – Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Hungary – have been investigated.
The theory of endogenous development, namely the utilisation of the given resources, has become the focus of many empirical analyses and it means the framework of quantitative analysis. The main aim of the paper is the examination and explanation of the effects of each capital on development.
A model is proposed that explains development and includes latent variables symbolising the forms of capital.  The model then is further examined using a Partial Least Squares (PLS) path analysis. This shows and helps to understand the connections between the various forms of capital, although the model is only valid in a Visegrad context.
The first part of the paper reviews the academic literature of development theories, and it outlines how the concept has been understood and developed in the last few decades. In the next chapter of the paper, the concept is examined from a narrower perspective and the focus is on the theory of endogenous development, which is assumed to be a qualitative change. Despite the fact that in this case it is very difficult to carry out quantitative analyses, they have an obvious relevance in regional research. Besides defining endogenous development, several models and capitals are compared in the paper. The compa rison shows the most important elements by the usage of which the development of the Visegrad regions becomes measurable.
The methodology of the empirical test can be found in the next chapter, and it means that research questions were tried to be answered based on the latest statistical indicators, i.e., the Eurostat database and the national databases of the Visegrad countries. In the abovementioned countries 115 NUTS3 regions can be found, hence this array of territories serves as the framework for the quantitative analysis. The territorial units are compared to multivariate analysis, so the accumulation of various forms of capitals has been analysed by PLS path analysis. With the help of the method, a simultaneous factor and regression analysis is run, enabling the analysis of the direct and indirect effects among the latent variables. It helps to highlight the effects of capitals on each of these.

Keywords: regions of Visegrad Countries, Endogenous Development, Partial Least Squares Path Analysis.

Published: July 1, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bodnár, G., Kovács, P., & Egri, Z. (2022). Elements of Endogenous Development in the Regions of Visegrad Countries. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism14(1), 29-49. doi: 10.32725/det.2022.002
Download citation

References

  1. AEIDL [European Association for Information on Local Development] (1999). Territorial competitiveness. Creating a territorial development strategy in light of the LEADER experience. Part 1. LEADER European Observatory AEIDL, Bruxelles, http://www.esponontheroad.eu/dane/web_espon_library_files/698/zl_competitivity.pdf Download: 12 June 2019
  2. Affuso, A., & Camagni, R. (2010). Territorial Capital and Province Performance in the Latin Arch: An Econometric Approach. Politecnico di Milano. http://www.grupposervizioambiente.it/aisre/pendrive2010/pendrive/Paper/affuso1.pdf
  3. Amin, A. (1999). An Institutionalist Perspective on Regional Economic Development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 365-378. Go to original source...
  4. Atkinson, R. (2013). Territorial Capital, Attractiveness and the Place-based Approach: the Potential Implications for Territorial Development. In Pálné Kovács, I. - Scott, J. - Gál, Z. (eds.). Territorial Cohesion in Europe. For the 70th Anniversary of the Transdanubian Research Institute. IRS CERS HAS, Pécs, 297-308.
  5. Benko, G. (1997). A regionális fejlődés útjai: globálistól a lokálisig. Tér és Társadalom, 11(2), 1-16. Go to original source...
  6. Braithwaite, K. (2009). Building on What You Have Got - A Guide to Optimising Assets. Carnegie UK Trust, Dunfermline, UK.
  7. Brasili, C., Saguatti, A., Benni, F., Marchese, A., & Gandolfo, D. (2012). The Impact of the Economic Crisis on the Territorial Capital of Italian Regions. 52nd European Regional Science Congress. 21-25 August. Bratislava. http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa12/e120821aFinal00646.pdf
  8. Camagni, R. (2008). Regional competitiveness: towards a concept of territorial capital. In Capello, R., Camagni, R., Chizzolini, B., & Fratesi, U. (eds.). Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 33-47. Go to original source...
  9. Camagni, R., Caragliu, A., & Perucca, G. (2011). Territorial Capital. Relational and Human Capital. Draft version. Politecnico di Milano. Milano. http://www.grupposervizioambiente.it/aisre_sito/doc/papers/Camagni_Caragliu_Perucca.pdf
  10. Capello, R. (2007). Regional Economics. Routledge, Oxon.
  11. Capello, R. (2011). Location, Regional Growth and Local Development Theories. Aestimum, 58(1), 1-25. Go to original source...
  12. Capello, R. (2012). Regional Economics: Theoretical Achievements and Challenges. Timisoara Journal of Economics, 18(5), 313-335.
  13. Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Regional growth and development theories revisited. In Stimson, R., Stough, R. R., & Nijkamp. P. (eds.). Endogenous Regional Development. Perspectives, Measurement and Empirical Investigation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK - Northampton, MA, USA, 301-324. Go to original source...
  14. Capello, R., & Perucca, G. (2013). Do Eastern European Regions Move Towards an Endogenous Growth Pattern? A Diachronic Perspective of Regional Success Factors. GRINCOH Working Paper Series, Paper No. 1.15 Go to original source...
  15. Chant, S., & McIlvaine, C. (2009). Geographies of Development in the 21st Century. An Introduction to the Global South. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK-Northampton, MA, USA.
  16. Dinya, L. (2013). "Zöld" prioritások érvényesítése a megyei szintű területfejlesztési stratégiákban. Journal of Central European Green Innovation, 1(1), 21-33.
  17. EC [European Comission] (2017). Competitiveness in low-income and low-growth regions. The lagging regions report. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels.
  18. Enyedi, G. (1998). Sikeres régiók, In Tények könyve: régiók. Greger-Delacroix, 409-411.
  19. Fratesi, U., & Perucca, G. (2019). EU regional development policy and territorial capital: A systemic approach. Papers in Regional Science, 98(1), 265-281. Go to original source...
  20. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, Sage. Go to original source...
  21. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5-6), 320-340. Go to original source...
  22. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing: Advances in International Marketing, Vol. 20, 277-319. Go to original source...
  23. Henseler, J. (2010). On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm. Computational Statistics, 25(1), 107-120. Go to original source...
  24. Hetesi, E., & Révész, B. (2013). Melyik a fontosabb? Információs technológia alapú és személyes kapcsolatok a business marketingben. In Tompos A., Ablonczyné Mihályka L. (eds.). Növekedés és egyensúly. Kautz Gyula Emlékkonferencia, 2013. június 11., Széchenyi István Egyetem Kautz Gyula Gazdaságtudományi Kar Győr. http://kgk.sze.hu/images/dokumentumok/kautzkiadvany2013/marketing/hetesi_revesz.pdf
  25. ETC [ETC Foundation - Compas] (2007). Learning Endogenous Development - Building on Bio-cultural Diversity. ETC Foundation - Compas, Bourton on Dunsmore, Rugby, Warwickshire, UK.
  26. Hoff, K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2001). Modern Economic Theory and Development. In Meier, G. M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (eds.). Frontiers of Development Economics. The Future in Perspective. World Bank - Oxford University Press, Oxford-Washington, 389-459.
  27. Kazár, K. (2014). A PLS-útelemzés és alkalmazása egy márkaközösség pszichológiai érzetének vizsgálatára. Statisztikai Szemle, 92(1), 33-52.
  28. Kazár, K. (2017). A márkaközösségek pszichológiai érzetének vizsgálata egy zenei fesztivál esetén. Marketing és menedzsment, EMOK issue, 38-48.
  29. Kitson, M., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2004). Regional Competitiveness: An Elusive yet Key Concept? Regional Studies, 38(9), 991-999. Go to original source...
  30. Kotosz, B., & Lengyel I. (2018). Térségek konvergenciájának vizsgálata a V4-országokban. Statisztikai Szemle, 96(11-12), 1069-1090. Go to original source...
  31. Kovács, A. (2015). Strukturális egyenletek modelljének alkalmazása a Közös Agrárpolitika 2013-as reformjának elemzésére. Statisztikai Szemle, 93(8-9), 801-822.
  32. Kovács, P., & Bodnár, G. (2016). Az endogén fejlődés értelmezése vidéki térségekben PLS-útelemzés segítségével. Statisztikai Szemle, 94(2), 143-161. Go to original source...
  33. Kovács, P., & Bodnár, G. (2017). Examining the Factors of Endogenous Development in Hungarian Rural Areas by Means of PLS Path Analysis. Regional Statistics, 7(1), 90-114. Go to original source...
  34. Krenyácz, É. (2015). A hazai egészségügyi intézmények kontrolling-rendszere. Statisztikai Szemle, 93(8-9), 823-857.
  35. Lengyel, I. (2012a). Regionális növekedés, fejlődés, területi tőke és versenyképesség. In Bajmócy Z., Lengyel I., Málovics G. (eds.). Regionális innovációs képesség, versenyképesség és fenntarthatóság. JATEPress, Szeged, 151-174.
  36. Lengyel, I. (2012b). A hazai területfejlesztés zsákutcái: a triális Magyarország. In Rechnitzer J., Rácz Sz. (eds.). Dialógus a regionális tudományról. Széchenyi István Egyetem Regionális- és Gazdaságtudományi Doktori Iskola, Magyar Regionális Tudományi Társaság, Győr, 140-150.
  37. Lengyel, I. (2012c). A területi tőke lehetséges szerepe a regionális növekedés magyarázatában. In Hardi T., Nárai M. (eds.). Térszerkezet és területi folyamatok: tanulmánykötet Rechnitzer János tiszteletére. MTA KRTK Regionális Kutatások Intézete, Pécs-Győr, 57-73.
  38. Lengyel, I. (2017). Competitive and uncompetitive regions in transition economies: the case of the Visegrad post-socialist countries. In Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (eds.). Handbook of Regions and Competitiveness. Contemporary Theories and Perspectives on Economic Development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK - Northampton, MA, USA, 398-415. Go to original source...
  39. Lengyel, I., & Szakálné Kanó, I. (2012). Competitiveness of Hungarian Urban Micro-regions: Localization Agglomeration Economies and Regional Competitiveness Function. Területi Statisztika, 2(1), 27-44. Go to original source...
  40. Lewis, W. A. (1988). The Roots of Development Theory. In Chenery H., & Srinivasan, T. N. (eds.). Handbook of Development Economics. (Vol. I.) Elsevier, Amsterdam, 27-37. Go to original source...
  41. Milone, P., Ventura, F., Berti, G., & Brunori, G. (2010). Some Notes on the Identification of Rural Webs. In Milone, P., & Ventura, F. (eds.). Networking the Rural. Royal Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands, 30-48.
  42. Münnich, Á., & Hidegkuti, I. (2012). Strukturális egyenletek modelljei: oksági viszonyok és komplex elméletek vizsgálata pszichológiai kutatásokban. Alkalmazott Pszichológia, 5(1), 77-102.
  43. Rechnitzer, J. (2016). A területi tőke a városfejlődésben. A Győr-kód. Dialóg Campus Kiadó, Budapest-Pécs.
  44. Robbins, L. (1968). The Theory of Economic Development int he History of Economic Thought. London-Basingstoke, Macmillan. Go to original source...
  45. Sen, A. (1988). The Concept of Development. In Chenery H. - Srinivasan, T. N. (eds.). Handbook of Development Economics. (Vol. I.) Elsevier, Amsterdam, 9-26.
  46. Smętkowski M. (2018). The role of exogenous and endogenous factors in the growth of regions in Central and Eastern Europe: the metropolitan/non-metropolitan divide in the pre- and post-crisis era. European Planning Studies, 26(2), 256-278. Go to original source...
  47. Stimson, R., Stough, R. R., & Nijkamp. P. (2011). Endogenous Regional Development. In Stimson, R., Stough, R. R., & Nijkamp. P. (eds.). Endogenous Regional Development. Perspectives, Measurement and Empirical Investigation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK - Northampton, MA, USA, 1-19. Go to original source...
  48. Stimson, R., Stough, R. R., & Salazar, M. (2009). Leadership and Institutions in Regional Endogenous Development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK - Northampton, MA, USA. Go to original source...
  49. Szentes, T. (2011). Fejlődés-gazdaságtan. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
  50. Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2009). Economic Development. (11th ed) Addison-Wesley, Boston.
  51. Tödtling, F. (2009). Endogenous Regional Development. In Kitchin, R., & Thrift, N. (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Elsevier, Oxford, 208-213. Go to original source...
  52. Tóth B. I. (2013). A területi tőke szerepe a regionális- és városfejlődésben - Esettanulmány a magyar középvárosok példáján. Doktori értekezés. Nyugat-magyarországi Egyetem Széchenyi István Gazdálkodás- és Szervezéstudományok Doktori Iskola, Sopron.
  53. Tubadji, A., & Nijkamp. P. (2015). Cultural impact on regional development: application of a PLS-PM model to Greece. The Annals of Regional Science, 54(3), 680-720. Go to original source...
  54. Vázquez-Barquero, A., & Rodríguez-Cohard, J. C. (2016). Endogenous Development and Institutions: Challenges for Local Development Initiatives. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 34(6), 1135-1153. Go to original source...
  55. Vermeire, B., Gellynck, X., De Steur, H., & Viaene, J. (2008). The role of social capital assets in reconciling endogenous and exogenous drivers of rural renewal. 8th European IFSA Symposium, 6 - 10 July 2008, Clermont-Ferrand, France, http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/fileadmin/Proceeding2008/2008_WS6_06_Vermeire.pdf

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.