DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2022, 14(2):108-126 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2022.016

The implementation of the circular economy requirements among Hungarian enterprises – capital versus countryside

Hajnalka Fekete-Berzsenyia, Melinda Koczor-Keulb, Tamás Molnárc
a University of Pannonia, Department of Accountancy and Controlling, Veszprém, Hungary
b University of Pannonia, Department of Business Economics, Veszprém, Hungary
c University of Pannonia, Department of Business Economics, Veszprém, Hungary

In the spirit of sustainability business organisations have also put the circular approach to the forefront, and are trying to conduct their activities accordingly. They are developing technological improvements, innovative products and services to reduce their environmental footprint. The importance of protecting the environment and the principles of the circular economy have become key competitiveness factors. This study presents the commitment to the circular economy approach at the level of economic organizations. The survey included the 5,000 largest enterprises based on the number of employees established in Hungary in the form of an electronic questionnaire, from which the results from 202 responding enterprises were evaluated. Our research questions focus on what clusters companies can be classified into according to the environmental orientation in accordance with the framework of a circular economy, and whether there is a correlation between the companies' belonging to each cluster and their territorial location. The main methods used to analyze the results were Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, cluster analysis and cross-tabulation analysis. The results show that enterprises can be divided into three clusters based on the environmental focus, and the difference between the capital and the countryside is also strongly felt. Based on the results, we can state that the nationwide analyzes show that the paradigm shift has really started in the business practice, measurably in favor of rural enterprises. Businesses have recognized that their territorial competitiveness position will be strengthened if they adopt an environmentally sound management approach.

Keywords: sustainability, circular economy, competitiveness, cluster analysis, crosstab analysis

Received: August 9, 2022; Revised: September 9, 2022; Accepted: December 29, 2022; Published: December 29, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fekete-Berzsenyi, H., Koczor-Keul, M., & Molnár, T. (2022). The implementation of the circular economy requirements among Hungarian enterprises – capital versus countryside. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, 14(2), 108-126. doi: 10.32725/det.2022.016
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alshehhi, A., Nobanee, H., & Khare, N. (2018). The impact of sustainability practices on corporate financial performance: Literature trends and future research potential. Sustainability, 10(2), 494, 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10020494 Go to original source...
    2. Antikainen, M., & Valkokari, K. (2016). A framework for sustainable circular business model innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6 (7), 5-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1000 Go to original source...
    3. Barbaritano, M., Bravi, L., & Savelli, E. (2019). Sustainability and quality management in the Italian luxury furniture sector: A circular economy perspective. Sustainability, 11(11), 3089. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11113089 Go to original source...
    4. Bedenik, N. O., Prebeľac, D., Strugar I., & Bariąić, P. (2019). The Challenges of Controlling and IT Support in Non-financial Reporting. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM), 10, (1) 21-29. http://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2019-1-021 Go to original source...
    5. Briem, A. K., Betten, T., Held, M., Wehner, D., & Baumann, M. (2019). Environmental Sustainability in the Context of Mass Personalisation - Quantification of the Carbon Footprint with Life Cycle Assessment. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (IJIEM), 10 (2), 171-180. DOI http://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2019-2-237: Go to original source...
    6. Chodkowska-Miszczuk, J., Kulla, M., Novotný, L. (2019). Biogas energy - a chance for agriculture and rural development? Insight from the post-communist Central Europe. Deturope,11(2), 30-53 https://doi.org/10.32725/det.2019.014 Go to original source...
    7. Csizmásné Tóth, J. et al. (2018). Energy and renewable energy use in EU28 and Hungary ohttps://www.deturope.eu/savepdfs/det/2019/02/03.pdf
    8. n the basis of statistics. Analecta Technica Szegedinensia 12 : 2 pp. 51-56. 6 p. https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2018.2.51-56 Go to original source...
    9. www.analecta.hu/index.php/analecta/article/download/31577/31266
    10. Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2016). Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2741-2751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196 Go to original source...
    11. Engel, H., Stuchtey, M. & Vanthournout, H. (2016). Ahead of the curve: Innovative models for waste management in emerging markets. In: L. Rahilly (Ed.) McKinsey Center for Business and Environment: The Circular Economy: Moving from Theory to Practice. Special edition, (pp. 11-16). from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Sustainability/Our%20Insights/The%20circular%20economy%20Moving%20from%20theory%20to%20practice/The%20circular%20economy%20Moving%20from%20theory%20to%20practice.ashx
    12. Fernando, Y., Shaharudin, M. S., & Abideen, A. Z. (2022). Circular economy-based reverse logistics: dynamic interplay between sustainable resource commitment and financial performance. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print, pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-08-2020-0254 Go to original source...
    13. Fianko, S. K., Amoah, N., Afrifa, S. Jnr, & Dzogbewu, T. C. (2021). Green Supply Chain Management and Environmental Performance: The moderating role of Firm Size. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 12 (3), 163 - 173. http://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2021-3-285 Go to original source...
    14. Franco-García, M-L., Carpio-Aguilar, J. C., & Bressers, H. (2019). Towards zero waste, circular economy boost: waste to resources. In Franco-García, M-L., Carpio-Aguilar, J. C. & Bressers H. (Ed.), Towards Zero Waste pp. 1-8 New York, (USA): Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92931-6 Go to original source...
    15. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner production, vol. 114, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 Go to original source...
    16. Gliem, J. A. & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In 2003 Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, 82-88. from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Calculating%2C-Interpreting%2C-And-Reporting-Cronbach%E2%80%99s-Gliem-Gliem/42147770ce652e700e5623d4611f315addfeee2a
    17. Hollósy, Zs. et al. (2021a). Az energia és megújuló energia termelésének és felhasználásának aktualitásai, várható tendenciái a világon és az EU-ban: Energy, renewable energy, current issues of production and use - expected trends in the world and in the EU. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember 9 : 1 pp. 35-49. , 15 p.
    18. https://tge.sze.hu/images/dokumentumok/K%C3%B6tetek%20%C3%B6sszes%20cikkel/2021.%20IX.%20%C3%A9vfolyam%201.%20sz%C3%A1m_cikkek/2021_9_evfolyam_1_szam_Hollosy_Kiss_Poor.pdf
    19. Hollósy, Zs. et al. (2021b). Napelemes áramtermelő rendszerek aktuális ökonómiai és környezeti szempontú értékelése. Studia Mundi - Economica 8 : 1 pp. 37-48. , 12 p. https://doi.org/10.18531/studia.mundi.2021.08.01.37-48 Go to original source...
    20. http://real.mtak.hu/136200/1/studia_mundi_vol_8_no_1_4.pdf
    21. Janik, A., & Ryszko, A. (2019). Circular economy in companies: an analysis of selected indicators from a managerial perspective. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering, 2 (1), 523-535. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/mape-2019-0053 Go to original source...
    22. Johl, S. K., & Toha, M. A. (2021). The nexus between proactive eco-innovation and firm financial performance: A circular economy perspective. Sustainability, 13(11), 6253, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116253 Go to original source...
    23. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, conservation and recycling, 127, 221-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 Go to original source...
    24. Kiss, L. B. et al. (2021). Megújuló energiák az EU közlekedésében. Studia Mundi - Economica 8 : 2 pp. 47-59. , 13 p. Go to original source...
    25. https://doi.org/10.18531/studia.mundi.2021.08.02.47-59 http://real.mtak.hu/136210/1/studia_mundi_vol_8_no_2_4.pdf Go to original source...
    26. Kiss, T. et al. (2019). Termelőüzem ökológiai szempontú tervezése. Közgazdasági Szemle 66 : 7-8 pp. 863-886. , 24 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.18414/KSZ.2019.7-8.863 http://real.mtak.hu/95073/1/08KissTiborstb.pdf Go to original source...
    27. Kozma, D. E., Barna, K. M., & Molnár, T. (2021). Rangsoroljunk vagy nem? A körforgásos gazdaság mérési lehetőségei és azok összehasonlítása az EU-tagországokban. Vezetéstudomány - Budapest Management Review, 52 (8), 63-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2021.09.05 Go to original source...
    28. Kravchenko, M., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. A. (2020). To what extent do circular economy indicators capture sustainability? Procedia CIRP, vol. 90, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.118 Go to original source...
    29. Kristensen, H. S., & Mosgaard, M. A. (2020). A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy - moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 243, 118531, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118531 Go to original source...
    30. Kwarteng, A., Simpson, S. N. Y., & Agyenim-Boateng, C. (2021). The effects of circular economy initiative implementation on business performance: the moderating role of organizational culture. Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-01-2021-0045 Go to original source...
    31. Lengyel, P., Bai, A., Gabnai, Z., Mustafa, O. M. A, Balogh, P., Péter, E., Tóth-Kaszás, N., & Németh, K. (2021). Development of the Concept of Circular Supply Chain Management - A Systematic Review. Processes, 9, 1740, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9101740 Go to original source...
    32. Lindgreen, R.E., Salomone, R., & Reyes, T. (2020). A critical review of academic approaches, methods and tools to assess circular economy at the micro level. Sustainability, 12(12), 4973. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124973 Go to original source...
    33. Lu, W., Shen, L. & Yam, M.C. (2008). Critical success factors for competitiveness of contractors: China study. Journal of construction engineering and management, 134 (12), 972-982. DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733-93642008134:12972 Go to original source...
    34. MacArthur, E. (2013). From linear to circular - Accelerating a proven concept. In Potocnik J. (Ed.), Towards the circular economy, economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition (pp. 21-34). Cowes (UK): Ellen MacArthur Foundation. https://www.werktrends.nl/app/uploads/2015/06/Rapport_McKinsey-Towards_A_Circular_Economy.pdf
    35. Mancini, E., & Raggi, A. (2021). A review of circularity and sustainability in anaerobic digestion processes. Journal of Environmental Management vol. 291, 11269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112695 Go to original source...
    36. McGregor, J.A., & Pouw, N. (2017). Towards an economics of well-being. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41, 1123-1142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew044 Go to original source...
    37. Molnár, T. (2015). Empirikus területi kutatások. Budapest (Hungary): Akadémiai Kiadó, https://doi.org/10.1556/9789634540229 Go to original source...
    38. Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G. A., Alaerts, L., VanAcker, K., de Meester, S., & J. Dewulf (2019). Circular economy indicators: What do they measure? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 146, 452-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045 Go to original source...
    39. Moric, I., Jovanović, J. ©., Đoković, R., Peković, S., & Perović, Đ. (2020). The effect of phases of the adoption of the circular economy on firm performance: evidence from 28 EU countries. Sustainability, 12(6), 2557. 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12062557 Go to original source...
    40. Neumanné, V. I., & Varga-Dani, B. (2020). The Principle of Circular Economy in Tourism at Lake Balaton. Pannon Management Review, vol. 9, Special Issue, 25-42. from https://pmr.uni-pannon.hu/articles/pmr_9_1.pdf#page=25
    41. Neumanné, V. I., & Varga-Dani, B., (2021). Fenntarthatóság és körforgásos gazdaság szemlélete a Balaton Turisztikai Térségben. Comitatus: Önkormányzati szemle, vol. 31, Special Issue, 150-162. http://www.mrtt.hu/files/comitatus/comitatus_2021_kulonszam.pdf
    42. Parchomenko, A., Nelen, D., Gillabel, J., & Rechberger, H. (2019). Measuring the circular economy - A Multiple Correspondence Analysis of 63 metrics. Journal of cleaner production, vol. 210, 200-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.357 Go to original source...
    43. Philp, J., & Winickoff, D. E. (2018). Realising the circular bioeconomy. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, November 2018 no. 60, Paris (France): OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/31bb2345-en Go to original source...
    44. Rehman Khan, S. A., Yu, Z., Sarwat, S., Godil, D. I., Amin S., & Shujaat, S. (2021). The role of block chain technology in circular economy practices to improve organisational performance. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Vol. 24, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2021.1872512 Go to original source...
    45. Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Kafyeke, T., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M. & Ioannou, A. (2015). The circular economy: Barriers and opportunities for SMEs. CEPS Working Documents, 412, 1-22. from http://aei.pitt.edu/67297/1/WD412_GreenEconet_SMEs_Circular_Economy.pdf
    46. Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., & Kendall, A. (2019). A taxonomy of circular economy indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production vol. 207, 542-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.014 Go to original source...
    47. Sariatli, F. (2017) Linear Economy Versus Circular Economy: A Comparative and Analyzer Study for Optimization of Economy for Sustainability. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 31-34. DOI: 10.1515/vjbsd-2017-0005 Go to original source...
    48. Schönborn, G., Berlin, C., Pinzone, M., Hanisch, C., Georgoulias, K., & M. Lanz. (2019). Why social sustainability counts: The impact of corporate social sustainability culture on financial success. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.008 Go to original source...
    49. Szép, S.T. (2016). Energy convergence of the European Union toward 2020. Deturope, 8, 3: 88-107 https://doi.org/10.32725/det.2016.024 Go to original source...
    50. https://www.deturope.eu/pdfs/det/2016/03/07.pdf
    51. Takács, Sz., & Kárász, J. (2015). Egy egyszerű, újfajta kereszt-validálási eljárás bemutatása. Psychologia Hungarica, II/1, 65-77. From https://epa.oszk.hu/02400/02497/00003/pdf/EPA02497_PsychologiaHungaricaCaroliensis_2014_01_65-77.pdf
    52. Uhrenholt, J. N., Kristensen, J. H., Gil, M. C. R., Jensen, S. F., & Waehrens, B. V. (2022). Circular economy: Factors affecting the financial performance of product take-back systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 335, 130319, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130319 Go to original source...
    53. Wells, P., & Seitz, M. (2005). Business models and closed-loop supply chains: a typology. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10 (4), 249-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13598540510612712 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content