DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2022, 14(3):34-64 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2022.021

The role of the foundational economy: The case of two regional centres in Central and Eastern Europe.

Zsuzsanna Zsibók, Ildikó Egyed
Centre for Economic and Regional Studies Institute for Regional Studies

Our comparative research examines the changes in the economic position of two rural regional centres, Cluj-Napoca and Pécs, in the post-crisis period. The focus of our interest is the sectoral structure of the local economies in the light of the concept of ‘foundational economy’. Our empirical research covers data from the largest local firms in each of the two cities, as well as regionally aggregated data, analysed from a labour productivity perspective with exploratory statistical methods. The source of our data is the Orbis Europe enterprise database, supplemented by EuroStat data at regional level. Our results suggest that due to the large weight of the foundational economy in both cities, it should be considered an important driver of long-term territorial development and local well-being. There are several sectors in the local economy of the two cities where some activities of the foundational economy excel in productivity, thus we cannot establish a direct contradiction between the high weight of the foundational economy and lower efficiency.

Keywords: labour productivity, foundational economy, regional growth, urban dynamics, Central and Eastern Europe

Published: December 31, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zsibók, Z., & Egyed, I. (2022). The role of the foundational economy: The case of two regional centres in Central and Eastern Europe. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism14(3), 34-64. doi: 10.32725/det.2022.021
Download citation

References

  1. Altomonte, C., & Békés, G. (eds.) (2016). Measuring competitiveness in Europe: resource allocation, granularity and trade. Brussels: Bruegel.
  2. Andrews, D., Criscuolo, C., & Gal, P. N. (2019). The best versus the rest: divergence across firms during the global productivity slowdown, CEP Discussion Papers dp1645, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE. https://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp1645.pdf (retrieved on 30.06.2022).
  3. Askenazy, P., Bellmann, L., Bryson, A., & Moreno Galbis, E. (2016). Productivity Puzzles Across Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  4. Bailey, D., Cowling, K., & Tomlinson, P. (2015). New Perspectives on Industrial Policy for a Modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  5. Barbera, F., Negri, N., & Salento, A. (eds.) (2018). From individual choice to collective voice. Foundational economy, local commons and citizenship. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 59(2), 371-397. doi: 10.1423/90584 Go to original source...
  6. Barzotto, M., Corradini, C., Fai, F. M., Labory, S., & Tomlinson, P. R. (eds.) (2019). Revitalising Lagging Regions: Smart Specialisation and Industry 4.0. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367422745 Go to original source...
  7. Benedek, J., Varvari, Ş., & Litan, C. M. (2019). Urban Growth Pole Policy and Regional Development: Old Wine in New Bottles? In Lang, T., & Görmar, F. (eds.). Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation (pp. 173-195). New Geographies of Europe, Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. Go to original source...
  8. Bentham, J., Bowman, A., de la Cuesta, M., et al. (2013). Manifesto for the foundational economy. Working paper No. 131. Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change, Manchester.
  9. Berkes, J. (2020). The Economic Structure and Performance of the Catchment Area of the Hungarian Regional Centers. Deturope, 12(3), 58-81. doi: 10.32725/det.2020.022 Go to original source...
  10. Berry, B. J. L. (ed.) (1977). Urbanization and Counter Urbanization, Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, vol. II. London: Sage.
  11. Berry, C. (ed.) (2017). What we really mean when we talk about industrial strategy. Manchester, UK: Future Economies.
  12. Birch, K., & Cumbers, A. (2007). Public sector spending and the Scottish Economy: crowding out or adding value? Scottish Affairs, 58, 36-56., doi: 10.3366/scot.2007.0003 Go to original source...
  13. Bodnár, G., Kovács, P., & Egri, Z. (2022). Elements of Endogenous Development in the Regions of Visegrad Countries. Deturope, 14(1), 29-49. doi: 10.32725/det.2022.002 Go to original source...
  14. Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2006). Capitalism without compromise: Strong business and weak labor in Eastern Europe's new transnational industries. Studies in Comparative International Development, 41, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686305. Go to original source...
  15. Braudel, F. (1979). Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme, Paris: Armand Colin.
  16. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  17. Davezies, L. (2009). L'économie locale résidentielle, Géographie, Economie, Société 11. Go to original source...
  18. Diemer, A., Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2022). The Regional Development Trap in Europe. Economic Geography. doi: 10.1080/00130095.2022.2080655. Go to original source...
  19. Dragan, M. (2019). Internal and International Migration in Cluj County (Romania) and Baranya County (Hungary). Romanian Review of Regional Studies, 15(2), 26-36.
  20. Egyed, I., & Rácz, S. (2020). The role of territorial capital in urban renewal in a non-core Central European city. Deturope, 12(3), 108-132. Go to original source...
  21. Engelen, E., Froud, J., Sukhdev, J., Salento, A., & Williams, K. (2017). The grounded city: from competitivity to the foundational economy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(3), 407-423. Go to original source...
  22. Éltető, A., & Alguacil, M. (2020). Global Flows, Local Conditions and Productivity Spillovers: The Case of the Central and Eastern European Countries. Cuadernos Economicos Del Ice, 100, 81-100. https://doi.org/10.32796/cice.2020.100.7119 Go to original source...
  23. Essletzbichler, J. (2022). Engaging with precarious urban futures: From entrepreneurial to grounded cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(4), 419-439. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764221087646 Go to original source...
  24. European Communities (2008). NACE Rev.2. Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  25. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF
  26. European Commission (2022). "Romania 2022 Country Report". https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/2022-european-semester-country-report-romania_en.pdf (retrieved on 15.11.2022)
  27. Faragó, L., & Lux, G. (2014). Kurrens portéka vagy múzeumi tárgy? Növekedési pólusok és iparági körzetek a fejlesztéspolitikában [Current chic or museum exhibit? Growth poles andindustrial districts in development policy]. Tér és Társadalom, 28(2), 11-30. Go to original source...
  28. Fina, S., Heider, B., & Rat, C. (2021). Unequal Romania: Regional Socio-economic disparities in Romania. Foundation for European Progressive Studies and Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
  29. Fol, S., & Cunningham-Sabot, E. (2010). Urban Decline and Shrinking Cities: A Critical Assessment of Approaches to Urban Shrinkage. Annales de géographie, 674, 359-383. Go to original source...
  30. Forth J., & Rincon Aznar, A. (2018). Productivity in the UK's low-wage industries. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, UK.
  31. Froud, J., Johal, S., Moran, M., Salento, A., & Williams, K. (2018a). Foundational Economy: The Infrastructure of Everyday Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  32. Froud, J., Haslam, C., Johal, S., Tsitsianis, N. & Williams, K. (2018b). Foundational Liveability: Rethinking Territorial Inequalities. Working Paper No. 5. Manchester: Foundational Economy Collective.
  33. Froud, J., Haslam, C., Johal, S., & Williams, K. (2020). (How) does productivity matter in the foundational economy?, Local Economy, 35(4) 316-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094220956952 Go to original source...
  34. Galgóczi, B., Drahokoupil, J., Bernaciak, M., & Pavlínek, P. (eds.) (2015). Foreign investment in Eastern and Southern Europe after 2008. Still a lever of growth? University of Nebraska, Omaha.
  35. Gal, P. N. (2013). Measuring total factor productivity at the firm level using OECD-ORBIS. OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1049, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46dsb25ls6-en (retrieved on 24.06.2022) Go to original source...
  36. Gál, Z. (2022). A pécsi városrégió innovációs rendszere: a tudásalapú fejlesztések korlátai a periférián. Észak-magyarországi stratégiai füzetek, 19(3), 40-55. Go to original source...
  37. Gál, Z., & Lux, G. (2022). FDI-based regional development in Central and Eastern Europe: A review and an agenda. Tér és Társadalom, 36(3), 68-98. https://doi.org/10.17649/TET.36.3.3439 Go to original source...
  38. Grieveson, R. et al. (2021). Avoiding a Trap and Embracing the Megatrends:Proposals for a New Growth Model in EU-CEE. wiiw Research Report No. 458, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Wien.
  39. Győri, T. (2021). Labour market crisis management after crisis of 2008 - Intervention expenditure and "Europe 2020" indicators. Deturope, 13(3), 4-31. doi: 10.32725/det.2021.017 Go to original source...
  40. Hadjimichalis, C. (2011). Uneven geographical development and socio-spatial justice and solidarity: European regions after the 2009 financial crisis. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(3), 254-74. Go to original source...
  41. Hajdú, Z., Horeczki, R., & Rácz, S. (2017). Changing settlement networks in Central and Eastern Europe with special regard to urban networks. In Lux, G., & Horváth, G. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook to Regional Development in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 123.140). London; New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  42. Hall, S., & Schafran, A. (2017). From foundational economics and the grounded city to foundational urban systems. Foundational Economy Working Paper 3.
  43. Haase, A., Bernt, M., Großmann, K., Mykhnenko, V., & Rink, D. (2016). Varieties of shrinkage in European cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 86-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413481985 Go to original source...
  44. Hansen, T. (2021). The foundational economy and regional development. Regional Studies, 56(6), 1033-1042, doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1939860 Go to original source...
  45. Horeczki, R., & Mezei, C. (2020). A helyi vállalkozásfejlesztési eszközök [Local economic development tools]. In Lux, G. (ed.). Ipari középvállalatok és regionális fejlődés [Mid-size manufacturing companies and regional development] (pp. 213-229). Budapest: Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó.
  46. Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO) (2020). Külföldi irányítású vállalkozások Magyarországon, 2020 [Foreign controlled entrepreneurships in Hungary, 2020]. https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/kulf_irany_vall/2020/index.html (retrieved on 29.06.2022)
  47. Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO) (2022). Külföldi közvetlentőke-befektetések Magyarországon megye és régió szerint - BPM6 [Foreign direct investments in Hungary by counties and regions - BPM6], https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/gsz/hu/gsz0039.html (retrieved on 29.06.2022)
  48. Jacobs, M., Hatfield, I., King, L., Raikes, L., & Stirling, A. (2017). Industrial Strategy: Steering Structural Change in the UK Economy. A Discussion Paper. London: IPPR Commission on Economic Justice.
  49. James, R., Midmore, P., & Thomas, D. (2012). Public Sector Size and Peripherality. Spatial Economic Analysis, 7(4), 447-460. doi:10.1080/17421772.2012.722666 Go to original source...
  50. Jones, R. (2019). A Resurgence of the Regions: rebuilding innovation capacity across the whole UK. Working paper.
  51. Keating, M. (2013). Rescaling the European State. The Making of Territory and the Rise of the Meso. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  52. Kolin-Sabján K., & Kolin, P. (2021). Önkormányzati tőkevonzás. Az önkormányzatok tőkevonzó Képessége [Capital Attraction by Local Governments. The capability of Local Governments to attract capital]. Budapest: Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem.
  53. Lengyel, I., Kanó, I. S., Vas, Z., & Lengyel, B. (2016). Az újraiparosodás térbeli kérdőjelei Magyarországon [Territorial questions of reindustrialization in Hungary]. Közgazdasági Szemle, 63(6), 615-646, doi:https://doi.org/10.18414/Ksz.2016.6.615 Go to original source...
  54. Lengyel, I., Kanó, I. S., Vas, Z., & Lengyel, B. (2017). Spatial differences of reindustrialization in a post-socialist economy: manufacturing in the Hungarian counties. European Planning Studies, 25(8), 1416-1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1319467 Go to original source...
  55. Lux, G. (ed.) (2020). Ipari középvállalatok és regionális fejlődés [Mid-size manufacturing companies and regional development]. Budapest: Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó.
  56. Lux, G. (2021). Manufacturing in the post-industrial city: the role of a "Hidden Sector" in the development of Pécs, Hungary. In Kunc, J., Cudny, W. (eds.). Growth and Change in Post-socialist Cities of Central Europe (pp. 94-112). London: Routledge. Go to original source...
  57. Lütke-Daldrup, E. (2001). Die perforierte Stadt, Eine Versuchsanordnung, Bauwelt 24, 40-42.
  58. MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O'Brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2022). Reframing urban and regional "development" for "left behind" places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1) 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab034 Go to original source...
  59. Martynovich, M., Hansen, T., & Lundquist, K.-J. (2022). Can foundational economy save regions in crisis?, Journal of Economic Geography, lbac027, https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbac027 Go to original source...
  60. Mihail, E., Cehan, A., & Lazăr, A. (2021). Patterns of Urban Shrinkage: A Systematic Analysis of Romanian Cities (1992-2020). Sustainability, 13(13), 7514. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137514 Go to original source...
  61. Monfort, P. (2020). Convergence of EU regions redux. Recent trends in regional disparities, WP02/2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/working-papers/2020/convergence-of-eu-regions-redux-recent-trends-in-regional-disparities (retrieved on 01.04.2022)
  62. Muraközy, B., Bisztray, M., & Reizer, B. (2018). Productivity differences in Hungary and mechanisms of TFP growth slowdown. Brussels: European Commission. doi:10.2873/33213 Go to original source...
  63. National Bank of Hungary [NBH] (2016). Növekedési jelentés. Budapest: National Bank of Hungary.
  64. National Bank of Hungary [NBH] (2022). Termelékenységi jelentés. Budapest: National Bank of Hungary.
  65. Nick, G., Várgedő, T., Nagy, C., & Szaller, Á. (2019). The Territorial Contexts of Industry 4.0 in Hungary, the Present and Future Challenges and Expectations of the Digital Ecosystem. Deturope, 11(3), 29-58. doi: 10.32725/det.2019.025 Go to original source...
  66. Norton, L., Pitt. A., & Zhao, W. (2022). Romania. Selected Issues. IMF Country Reports 22/311. Go to original source...
  67. OECD (2010). The Innovation Policy Mix. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2010. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  68. OECD (2014). All on Board. Making Inclusive Growth Happen. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/inclusive-growth/All-on-Board-Making-Inclusive-Growth-Happen.pdf
  69. OECD (2015). The future of productivity. OECD Publishing. Go to original source...
  70. Oswalt, P. (2005). Shrinking Cities: Volume 1: International Research. Ostfildern-Ruit, Germany: Hatje Cantz Verlag.
  71. Ouwehand, W. M., Van Oort, F. G., & Cortinovis, N. (2022). Spatial structure and productivity in European regions, Regional Studies, 56(1), 48-62. Go to original source...
  72. Popescu, C. (2014). Deindustrialization and Urban Shrinkage in Romania. What Lessons for the Spatial Policy? Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences. No. 42 E/2014, 181-202.
  73. Rácz, S. (2019). Development Processes of Regional Centres in Central and Southeast Europe - From State Socialism to Dependent Market Economies. Deturope, 11(2), 92-100. doi:10.32725/det.2019.017 Go to original source...
  74. Rácz, S., Kovács, S. Z., & Horeczki, R. (2021), Pécs. In Rechnitzer, J., & Berkes, J. (eds.). Nagyvárosok Magyarországon [Cities in Hungary] (pp. 207-218). Budapest: Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó.
  75. Rechnitzer, J., & Berkes, J. (eds.) (2021). Nagyvárosok Magyarországon [Cities in Hungary]. Budapest: Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó.
  76. Rokicki, B., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2019). Regional price deflators in Poland: evidence from NUTS-2 and NUTS-3 regions. Spatial Economic Analysis, 14(1), 88-105, doi:10.1080/17421772.2018.1503705 Go to original source...
  77. Russell, B., Beel, D., Jones, I. R., & Jones, M. (2022). Placing the Foundational Economy: An emerging discourse for post-neoliberal economic development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 54(6), 1069-1085. Go to original source...
  78. SIDU Cluj 2021-2030 https://files.primariaclujnapoca.ro/2022/02/03/SIDU-CLUJ-2021-2030.pdf (retrieved on 25.10.2022).
  79. Somlyódyné Pfeil, E. (2014). The Changing Roles of the State and Their Impact on Urban Policy. In Somlyódyné Pfeil, E. (ed.). Industrial Districts and Cities in Central Europe (pp. 46-63). Győr: Universitas-Győr Nonprofit Ltd.
  80. Stanley, I. (2020). Love's Labours Found. Industrial Strategy for Social Care and the Everyday Economy. London: Nesta.
  81. Statista Research Department (2022). FDI stock distribution in Romania 2020, by region, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1237990/romania-fdi-stock-distribution-by-region/ (retrieved on 29.06.2022)
  82. Szabó, P., Józsa, V., & Gordos, T. (2021). Cohesion policy challenges and discovery in 2021-2027. The case of Hungary. Deturope, 13(2), 66-100. doi:10.32725/det.2021.014 Go to original source...
  83. Tache, A., Tache, M., & Huzui-Stoiculescu, A. (2016). Assessment of Functional Policentricity in the Romanian County Residence Municipalities. Romanian Review of Regional Studies. 12(1), 25-38.
  84. Tsvetkova, A., Ahrend, R., Martins, J. O., Lembcke, A. C., Knutsson, P., Jong, D., & Terzidis, N. (2020). The spatial dimension of productivity: Connecting the dots across industries, firms and places, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2020/01, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ba5edb47-en. Go to original source...
  85. World Bank (2019). Romania Catching up Regions. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/255131580296079611/pdf/Romania-Catching-Up-Regions-Metropolitan-Romania.pdf (retrieved on 12.11.2022).
  86. Zsibók, Z., & Egyed, I. (2022). Post crisis Economic Environment of Two Central and Eastern European Regional Centres: a Comparative Approach. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe. 25(3), forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.25.21 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.