DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2022, 14(3):65-83 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2022.022

Labour market effects and changes among enterprises in free enterprise zones in Hungary

Zoltán András Dániel

The aim of regional development and planning, as defined in the 1996 Spatial Development Law, is to promote social and economic growth and reduce significant economic and infrastructure disparities. Its role is to support community initiatives to this end, with a particular emphasis on promoting the catching up of lagging regions, reducing unemployment and supporting the regeneration of industrial and agricultural businesses. This legislation enabled the creation of the Free Enterprise Zones in Hungary in 2013. The list, which has been extended twice since then, currently includes 1202 municipalities. Municipalities belonging to the zones create a favourable environment for investment, and businesses that invest and create jobs in the area can benefit from corporate tax relief and contributions payable by employers and are eligible for EU funding. According to the hypothesis of our research, the number of jobseekers in the municipalities of FEZs (compared to other municipalities) has decreased significantly, while the number of enterprises has increased. Furthermore, counties with a higher proportion of FEZ municipalities were presumed to have received more EU funds. To demonstrate this, we examined the labour market processes within FEZs due to the effects of their inclusion in the zones. Drawing on official labour market and business-related regional statistics, the analysis takes a regional perspective and seeks to focus on temporality. The database contains data at the level of municipalities (registered jobseekers, public employees, active enterprises, number of employees, subsidies) for the period under study (2012-2020). In addition to labour market processes, a further focus of the analysis was the inclusion of the SME sector to uncover mutually positive effects. According to the findings of our research, the positive impact on labour market processes cannot be clearly justified, whereas for the enterprises, inclusion in the zone induced positive effects. A positive effect was also found in terms of average staff numbers. The results show that the use of development aid is more effective for enterprises operating within the zones than in other parts of Hungary.

Keywords: Free Enterprise Zone, SME sector, Hungary, labour market effects

Published: December 31, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dániel, Z.A. (2022). Labour market effects and changes among enterprises in free enterprise zones in Hungary. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, 14(3), 65-83. doi: 10.32725/det.2022.022
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aggarwal, A. (2012). SEZ-led Growth in Taiwan, Korea, and India Implementing a Successful Strategy. Asian Survey, 52(5), 872-899. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2012.52.5.872 Go to original source...
    2. Aggarwal, A. (2019). Leveraging SEZs for Regional Integration in ASEAN A Synergistic Approach. Asian Survey, 59(5), 795-821. https://doi.org/10.1525/AS.2019.59.5.795 Go to original source...
    3. Alibegovic, D. J., Bakaric, I. R., & Slijepcevic, S. (2019). Impact assessment of entrepreneurial zones on local economic outcomes. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32(1), 3112-3127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1661004 Go to original source...
    4. Ambroziak, D., & Hartwell, C. (2018). The impact of investments in special economic zones on regional development: the case of Poland. Regional Studies, 52(10), 1322-1331. Go to original source...
    5. Bartik, T. J. (1985). Business Location Decisions in the United States: Estimates of the Effects of Unionization, Taxes, and Other Characteristics of States. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 3, 14-22. Go to original source...
    6. Bende, G. (2014). Nyitott szemmel stratégiai tanulmány. In "Közös tervezés a Sajó-völgy jövőjéről". HUSK/1101/1.5.1/0218.
    7. Boarnet, M. G. (2001). Enterprise Zones and Job Creation: Linking Evaluation and Practice. Economic Development Quarterly, 15(3), 242-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240101500304 Go to original source...
    8. Boarnet, M. G., & Bogart, W. T. (1996). Enterprise zones and employment: Evidence from New Jersey. Journal of Urban Economics, 40, 198-215. Go to original source...
    9. Bondonio, D., & Greenbaum, R. T. (2007). Do local tax incentives affect economic growth? What mean impacts miss in the analysis of enterprise zone policies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 121-136. Go to original source...
    10. Busso, M., Gregory, J., & Kline, P. (2013). Assessing the incidence and efficiency of a prominent place based policy. Am. Econ. Rev., 103(2), 897-947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.2.897. Go to original source...
    11. Ciżkowicz, P., Ciżkowicz-Pękała, M., Pękała, P., & Rzońca, A. (2017). The effects of special economic zones on employment and investment: A spatial panel modeling perspective. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(3), 571-605. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbw028 Go to original source...
    12. Cserneczky, T., Fejes, I., Finta, I., Magócs, K., Sain, M., Szabados, Z., Szabó, M., & Tóth. P. J. (2014): Vidékkutatás (2012-2013). In Finta, I. (ed.). Vidékkutatás (2012-2013). Pécs: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont Regionális Kutatások Intézete.
    13. Dániel, Z. A., & Takács, T. (2019): Előny-e a szabad vállalkozási zóna? Comitatus: önkormányzati szemle, 2019 tavasz, 66-74.
    14. Dániel, Z. A., Molnár, G., & Zaránd, S. (2018). The role of the local governments' tax policy in the location choice of SMEs. In Pop, G., Csata, A., Fejér-Király, G., Kassay, J., Nagy, B., Zsarnóczky, M., & Pál, L. (eds.). 14th Annual International Conference on Economics and Business: CHALLENGES IN THE CARPATHIAN BASIN: Innovation and technology in the knowledge based economy. Csíkszereda, Románia: Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, 222-229.
    15. Dorożyński, T., ¦wierkocki, J., & Urbaniak, W. (2017). FDI Inflow to Special Economic Zones in Poland Regional Approach. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences, 27, 87-103. Go to original source...
    16. Elvery, J. A. (2009). The impact of Enterprise Zones on resident employment. Econ. Dev. Q. 23(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242408326994. Go to original source...
    17. Erickson, R. A. (1991). Enterprise Zones 2: A Comparative Analysis of Zone Performance and State Government Policies. Mimeo, Pennsylvania State University. Go to original source...
    18. Ezmale, S., & Rimsane, I. (2013). Promoting the plurilingual awareness in business environment: case of Rezekne Special Economic Zone. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 110, 231-240. Go to original source...
    19. Fisher, P. S., & Peters, A. H. (1997). Tax and spending incentives and Enterprise zones. New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, issue Mar, 109-138.
    20. Forman, B., & Szaló, P. (2013). Település- és területi tervezés. In Jeney, L., Kulcsár, D., & Tózsa, I. (eds.). Gazdaságföldrajzi tanulmányok közgazdászoknak. Budapest: Gazdaságföldrajz és Jövőkutatás Tanszék, Budapesti Corvinus Egyetem, 111-126.
    21. Franczak, I. (2015). Special Economic Zones as a factor for activating regional economies. Research papers of Wrocław University of Economics.
    22. Freedman, M. (2013). Targeted business incentives and local labor markets. J. Hum. Resour., 48(2), 311-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.2.311. Go to original source...
    23. Givord, P., Quantin, S., & Trevien, C. (2018). A long-term evaluation of the first generation of French urban enterprise zones. Journal of Urban Economics, 105, 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2017.09.004 Go to original source...
    24. Givord, P., Rathelot, R., & Sillard, P. (2013). Place-based tax exemptions and displacement effects: an evaluation of the Zones Franches Urbaines program. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ., 43(1), 151-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.20 Go to original source...
    25. Glaeser, E. L., & Gottlieb, J. D. (2008). The economics of place-making policies. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 155-239. Go to original source...
    26. Gokhan, A. & Crittle, J. (2008). Special Economic Zones: Performance, Lessons Learned, and Implication for Zone Development. World Bank Working Papers, (45869).
    27. Greenbaum, R. T., & Engberg, J. B. (2004). The impact of state enterprise zones on urban manufacturing establishments. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 315-339. Go to original source...
    28. Gulbis, I. (2018). Foreign Direct Investment and Special Economic Zones in Latvia. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 6(1), 240-252. Go to original source...
    29. Ham, J. C., Imrohoroglu, A., Swenson, C., & Song, H. (2011). Government programs can improve local labor markets: evidence from State Enterprise Zones, Federal Empowerment Zones and Federal Enterprise Community. J. Public Econ., 95(7), 779-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11. Go to original source...
    30. Hanson, A. (2009). Local employment, poverty and property-value effects of geographically- targeted tax incentives: An instrumental variable approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39, 721-731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2009.07.002 Go to original source...
    31. Herrera, A. (2011). La Zona Especial Canaria: luces y sombras. Hacienda Canaria, 33, 93-108.
    32. Hoffman, I. (2018). Hungarian Counties and Regional development - Changing Roles in a Transforming Environment. Deturope, 10(3), 162-179. Go to original source...
    33. Horeczki, R., & Egyed, I. (2021). Small town development in peripheral areas. Deturope, 13(2): 52-65. doi:10.32725/det.2021.013 Go to original source...
    34. Jensen, C., & Winiarczyk, M. (2014). Special Economic Zones - 20 years later. CASE Network Studies & Analyses, Vol. 467. Go to original source...
    35. Jensen, C. (2018). The employment impact of Poland's special economic zones policy. Regional Studies, 52(7), 877-889. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1360477 Go to original source...
    36. Józsa, V. (2016). A magyarországi regionalizmus egy gyakorlati szakember szemével, Tér és Társadalom, 30(1), 37-55. doi:10.17649/TET.30.1.2731 Go to original source...
    37. Killingsworth, M. (1983). Labor Supply. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    38. Kline, P., & Moretti, E. (2014). Local economic development, agglomeration economies, and the big push: 100 years of evidence from the Tennessee valley authority. Q. J. Econ., 129(1), 275-331. Go to original source...
    39. Kormányrendelet (2013). 27/2013. Kormányrendelet a szabad vállalkozási zónák létrehozásának és működésének, valamint a kedvezmények igénybevételének szabályairól.
    40. Larkin, K., & Wilcox, Z. (2011). What would Maggie do? Why the Government's policy on Enterprise Zones needs to be radically different to the failed policy of the 1980s. London: Centre for cities.
    41. Lavation, S. A., & Miller, E. I. (1992). Enterprise Zones: A Promise Based on Rhetoric. Occasional Paper 1992-1, Center for Social Policy Studies, George Washington University, March.
    42. Leong, C. (2013). Special economic zones and growth in China and India: An empirical investigation. International Economics and Economic Policy, 10(4), 549-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-012-0223-6 Go to original source...
    43. Lipták, K. (2019). The importance of social innovations in rural areas. Deturope, 11(3), 160-174. doi:10.32725/det.2019.031 Go to original source...
    44. Litster, E. (1990). California Enterprise Zones: Assessment of Enterprise Zone Effectiveness and the Resulting Impact on Business Location and Employment. Unpublished Master's thesis, UCLA Department of Urban Planning.
    45. Lynch, D., & Zax, J. S. (2010). Incidence and Substitution in Enterprise Zone Programs: The Case of Colorado. Public Finance Review, 39(2), 226-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142110386210 Go to original source...
    46. Magyar Köztársaság, 1996. évi XXI. törvény a területfejlesztésről és a területrendezésről.
    47. Magyar Köztársaság, 2014. évi XXV. törvény egyes adótörvények és azokkal összefüggő más törvények módosításáról.
    48. Majerova, I. (2018). Regional Development and its Measurement in Visegrad Group Countries. Deturope, 10(2), 17-37. doi: 10.32725/det.2018.011 Go to original source...
    49. Molnár, T. (2015). Empirikus területi kutatások. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    50. Molnár, T., Molnár-Barna, K. (2019). Veszprém megye településeinek társadalmi és gazdasági fejlettsége [Social and Economic Development of Settlements of Veszprém County]. Deturope, 11(2), 169-184. doi:10.32725/det.2019.021 Go to original source...
    51. Neumark, D., & Simpson, H. (2014). Place-based policies. NBER Working Papers 20049. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Go to original source...
    52. O'Keefe, S. (2004). Job creation in California's enterprise zones: A comparison using a propensity score matching model. Journal of Urban Economics, 55(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2003.08.002 Go to original source...
    53. Papke, L. E., (1993). What do we know about Enterprise Zones? Tax Policy and the Economy, Volume 7. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, 37-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w4251 Go to original source...
    54. Pūle, B., & Innuse, G. (2017). The Importance of Special Economic Zones in Regions' Business Environment Development. In: The 2nd International Scientific Conference: Challenges of Globalization in Economics and Business. Tbilisi: Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Press, 396-404.
    55. Rácz, S. (2019). Development Processes of Regional Centres in Central and Southeast Europe - From State Socialism to Dependent Market Economies. Deturope, 11(2), 92-100. doi:10.32725/det.2019.017 Go to original source...
    56. Rathelot, R., & Sillard, P. (2009). Zones Franches Urbaines : quels effets sur l'emploi salarié et les créations d'établissements? Économie Statistique, 415-416 (1), 81-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/estat.2008.7021 Go to original source...
    57. Rubin, B. M., & Wilder, M. G. (1989). Urban Enterprise Zones: Employment Impacts and Fiscal Incentives. Journal of the American Planning Association, 55, 418-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368908975431 Go to original source...
    58. Rubin, M. (1985). Urban Enterprise Zones in the U.S.: A survey of state incentives. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Taxation Held under the Auspices of the National Tax Association-Tax Institute of America, 78, 207-215.
    59. Smętkowski, M. (2002). Polish special economic zones as an instrument of regional and industrial policy. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Centre for European Regional and Local Studies, University of Warsaw.
    60. Stojčić, N., Srhoj, S., & Coad, A. (2020). Innovation procurement as capability-building: Evaluating innovation policies in eight Central and Eastern European countries. European Economic Review, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103330 Go to original source...
    61. Varga, Z. (2018). A mikro- és kisvállalkozások uniós támogatási rendszerének problémái a Nyugat-Dunántúlon [Problems of the European Union support scheme of micro and small-enterprises in the Western Transdanubia]. Taylor, 10(2), 26-34.
    62. Varga, C. (2011). Kistérségek szerepe a tudásalapú társadalomban. Stratégiakutató Intézet.
    63. Wang, J. (2013). The economic impact of Special Economic Zones: Evidence from Chinese municipalities. Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, 101(C), 133-147. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.009 Go to original source...
    64. Wilder, M. G., & Rubin, B. M. (1996). Rhetoric versus Reality: A Review of Studies on State Enterprise Zone Programs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975713 Go to original source...
    65. Wong, M., & Buba, J. (2017). Special economic zones: an operational review of their impacts, s.l.: The World Bank.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content