DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism 2023, 15(3):4-31 | DOI: 10.32725/det.2023.020

The motivation structure of social entrepreneurs and its analysis from the perspective of self-determination theory.

Maté Repisky, Janka Tóth
University of Szeged, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Hungary 6722 Szeged, Kálvária sgt. 1.

In spite of the increasing research attention on social entrepreneurs, there is a lack of empirical studies investigating their motivations. Moreover, in ex-socialist countries, like Hungary, the foundation and acceptance of social enterprises are in a few decades delay in relation to Western Europe, which increases the need of related research in the region. The aim of the present qualitative study was to explore social entrepreneurs’ motivation and to investigate to what extent this motivational structure is autonomous. To reach these goals the researchers applied semi-structured personal deep interviews with open coding and analysis method. The identified motivational structure includes 19 motivational subcategories grouped into 5 main categories: social motivations; entrepreneurial motivations; personal motivations; environmental motivations; and governmental incentives. According to the results, for someone to become a social entrepreneur, the coexistence of at least three motivational main categories (entrepreneurial, social, and personal) seem to be necessary, while the other two main motivational categories (governmental incentives and environmental motivations) are only supportive ones. The research also found that the motivation of social entrepreneurs is dominantly autonomous. Controlled motivations are only significantly presented in two main motivational categories (personal motivations and governmental incentives).

Keywords: social entrepreneur, motivation, goals, self-determination theory

Received: September 30, 2022; Revised: September 14, 2023; Accepted: February 29, 2024; Published: March 1, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Repisky, M., & Tóth, J. (2023). The motivation structure of social entrepreneurs and its analysis from the perspective of self-determination theory. DETUROPE - The Central European Journal of Regional Development and Tourism, 15(3), 4-31. doi: 10.32725/det.2023.020
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bacq S., Alt E. (2018). Feeling capable and valued: A prosocial perspective on the link between empathy and social entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 33 (3), 333-350. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.01.004 Go to original source...
    2. Bacq S., Janssen F. (2011). The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23 (5-6), 373-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2011.577242 Go to original source...
    3. Bandura A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist, 28 (2), 117-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3 Go to original source...
    4. Barraket J., Mason C., Blain B. (2016). Finding Australia's Social Enterprise, Sector 2016: Final Report, Centre for Social Impact Swinburne.
    5. BIS Department for Businesses Innovation & Skolls (2011). A Guide to Legal Forms for Social Enterprise. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31677/11-1400-guide-legal-forms-for-social-enterprise.pdf at 25 October 2017.
    6. Blackburn R., Ram M. (2006). Fix or fixation? The contributions and limitations of entrepreneurship and small firms to combating social exclusion. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18 (1), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620500419566 Go to original source...
    7. Borzaga C., Depedri S., Galera G. (2012). Interpreting social enterprises. São Paulo, 47 (3), 398-409. https://doi.org/10.5700/rausp1046 Go to original source...
    8. Borzaga C., Solari L. (2004). Management challenges for social enterprises. In Borzaga C., Defourny J. (Ed.), The Emergence of Social Enterprise, (pp. 333-349). Psychology Press.
    9. Bosma N., Schott T., Terjesen S., Kew P. (2016). GEM Global Entrepreneurship Monitor - Special Topic Report: Social Entrepreneurship. Retrieved from http://gemconsortium.org/report/49542 at 25 January 2018. Go to original source...
    10. Carsrud A., Brännback M. (2011). Entrepreneurial motivations: what do we still need to know? Journal of Small Business Management, 49 (1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00312.x Go to original source...
    11. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications Ltd., London.
    12. Christopoulos D., Vogl S. (2015). The Motivation of Social Entrepreneurs: The Roles, Agendas and Relations of Altruistic Economic Actors. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 6 (1), 1-30. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2014.954254 Go to original source...
    13. Cretan R., Málovics G., Méreiné Berki B. (2020). On the production and contestation of (internalized) stigma: urban Roma in segregated areas of Szeged. Geographica Pannonica, 24 (4), 294-310. https://doi.org/10.5937/gp24-28226 Go to original source...
    14. Cukier W., Trenholm S., Carl D., Gekas G. (2011). Social Entrepreneurship: A Content Analysis. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7 (1), 99-119.
    15. Csillag S., Toarniczky A., Primecz, H. (2018). Dolgoznánk, ha hagynátok... Megváltozott munkaképességű emberek és a HR-rendszerek (We would work if you let us... People with disabilities and the HR systems). Vezetéstudomány (Budapest Management Review), 49 (6), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.14267/VEZTUD.2018.06.04 Go to original source...
    16. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11 (4), 227-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Go to original source...
    17. Deci E. L., Ryan R. M., Gagné M., Leone D. R., Usunov J., Kornazheva B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 27 (8), 930-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002 Go to original source...
    18. Dees J. G. (2001). The Meaning of "Social Entrepreneurship'. Retrieved from https://entrepreneurship.duke.edu/news-item/the-meaning-of-social-entrepreneurship/ at 5 December 2017.
    19. Defourny J., Nyssens M. (2010a). Conceptions of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: Convergences and Divergences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1 (1), 32-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420670903442053 Go to original source...
    20. Defourny J., Nyssens M. (2010b). Social enterprise in Europe: At the crossroads of market, public policies and third sector. Policy and Society, 29 (3), 231-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.07.002 Go to original source...
    21. Defourny J., Nyssens M. (2017). Fundamentals for an International Typology of Social Enterprise Models. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28 (6), 2469-2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7 Go to original source...
    22. Douglas E., Prentice C. (2019). Innovation and profit motivations for social entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set analysis. Journal of business research, 99, 69-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.031 Go to original source...
    23. Elfving J., Brännback M., Carsrud A. (2009). Toward a contextual model of entrepreneurial intentions. In Carsrud A., Brännback M. (Ed.), Understanding the entrepreneurial mind, (pp. 23-33). Springer, New York. Go to original source...
    24. Estay C., Durrieu F., Akhter M. (2013). Entrepreneurship: From motivation to start-up. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 11 (39), 243-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10843-013-0109-x Go to original source...
    25. European Commission (2014) A map of social enterprises and their eco-systems in Europe. Country Report: Hungary, ICF Consulting Services.
    26. Forster F. Grichnik D. (2013). Social Entrepreneurial Intention Formation of Corporate Volunteers. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4 (2), 153-181. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2013.777358 Go to original source...
    27. G. Fekete É., Bereczk Á., Kádárné H. Á., Kiss J., Péter Z., Siposné N. E., Szegedi K. (2017). Alapkutatás a társadalmi vállalkozások működéséről (Basic research on the operation of social enterprises). OFA Országos Foglalkoztatási Közhasznú Nonprofit Kft., Miskolc. Retrieved from http://piactars.hu/uploads/files/documents/Zarotanulmany_OFA_ME_GTK_2017_06_30.pdf at 5 December 2017.
    28. Gagné M., Deci E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26 (4), 331-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.322 Go to original source...
    29. Gelencsér K. (2003). Grounded theory. Szociológiai szemle 2003 (1), 143-154.
    30. Germak A. J., Robinson J. A. (2014). Exploring the motivation of nascent social entrepreneurs. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5 (1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2013.820781 Go to original source...
    31. Greguras G. J., Diefendorff J. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (2), 465-477. DOI: 10.1037/a0014068 Go to original source...
    32. Gidron B. (2014). Market-Oriented Social Enterprises Employing People with Disabilities: A Participants' Perspective. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5 (1), 60-76. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2013.829116 Go to original source...
    33. Hemingway C. A. (2005). Personal values as a catalyst for corporate social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 60 (3), 233-249. DOI 10.1007/s10551-005-0132-5 Go to original source...
    34. Hungarian Central Statistical Office (2023). Number of registered business units monthly, by legal forms - GFO'14, Retrieved from https://www.ksh.hu/stadat_files/gsz/en/gsz0051.html at 12 September 2023.
    35. Jenner P. (2016). Social enterprise sustainability revisited: an international perspective. Social Enterprise Journal, 12 (1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2014-0042 Go to original source...
    36. Kvale S. (2007). Doing interviews, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. Go to original source...
    37. Locke E. A., Baum J. R. (2007) Entrepreneurial motivation. In Baum J. R., Frese M., Baron R. A. (Ed.), The psychology of entrepreneurship, (pp. 93-112). Psychology Press, New York.
    38. Málovics G., Szakálné Kanó I., Imreh S. (2011). Companies, stakeholders and corporate sustainability - empirical insights from Hungary. In Burritt R. L., Schaltegger S., Bennett M., Pohjola T., Csutora, M. (Ed.), Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management. Eco-efficiency in Industry and Science, 27. (pp. 131-150). Springer, Dodrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_6 Go to original source...
    39. Miller T. L., Grimes M. G., McMullen J. S., Vogus T. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of management review, 37 (4), 616-640. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0456 Go to original source...
    40. Moss T. W., Short J. C., Payne G. T., Lumpkin G. T. (2011). Dual Identities in Social Ventures: An Exploratory Study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35 (4), 805-830. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00372.x Go to original source...
    41. Pardee R. L. (1990). Motivation Theories of Maslow, Herzberg, McGregor & McClelland. A Literature Review of Selected Theories Dealing with Job Satisfaction and Motivation. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED316767 at 21 February 2018.
    42. Petheő A. (2009). A vállalati társadalmi felelősségvállaláson túl: a szociális vállalkozás (Beyond corporate social responsibility: the social enterprise), PhD thesis. Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest.
    43. Ramlall S. (2004). A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for employee retention within organizations. Journal of American Academy of Business, 5 (1/2), 52-63.
    44. Renko M. (2013). Early challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 37 (5), 1045-1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00522. Go to original source...
    45. Repisky M., Tóth J. (2019). Mi motivál egy társadalmi vállalkozót? - Egy feltáró kvalitatív kutatás eredményei (What motives a social entrepreneur? - Results of an exploratory qualitative study), Vezetéstudomány (Budapest Management Review), 50 (3), 11-24. DOI: 10.14267/VEZTUD.2019.03.02 Go to original source...
    46. Robichaud Y., McGraw E., Alain R. (2001). Toward the development of a measuring instrument for entrepreneurial motivation. Journal of developmental entrepreneurship, 6 (2), 189-202.
    47. Roh T. H. (2016). The sharing economy: Business cases of social enterprises using collaborative networks. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 502-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.129 Go to original source...
    48. Rosa P. J., Kodithuwakku S., Balunywa W. (2006). Entrepreneurial Motivation in Developing Countries: What does 'Necessity' and 'Opportunity' Entrepreneurship Really Mean? Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 26 (20), Article 4. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1310913 Go to original source...
    49. Rotter J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies of internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80 (1), 1-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0092976 Go to original source...
    50. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55 (1), 68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Go to original source...
    51. Sastre-Castillo M. S., Peris-Ortiz M., Danvila-Del Valle I. (2015). What is different about the profile of the social entrepreneur? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25 (4), 349-369. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21138 Go to original source...
    52. SEFORIS research consortium (2016). Országjelentés, Magyarország. A magyarországi társadalmi vállalkozásokat bemutató első elemzés és leírás (Country Report, Hungary. The first analysis and description of social enterprises in Hungary). Retrieved from http://www.seforis.eu/hungary at 26 January 2018.
    53. Shane S., Locke E. A., Collins C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human resource management review, 13 (2), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611401444 Go to original source...
    54. Sharir M., Lerner M. (2006). Gauging the success of social ventures initiated by individual social entrepreneurs. Journal of World Business, 41 (1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.004. Go to original source...
    55. Shepherd D. A., Patzelt H. (2017). Trailblazing in entrepreneurship: Creating new paths for understanding the field. Springer. Go to original source...
    56. Shepherd D. A., Patzelt H. (2018). Entrepreneurial Cognition: Exploring the Mindset of Entrepreneurs. Springer. Go to original source...
    57. Sherman C. L., Randall C., Kauanui S. K. (2016). Are you happy yet? Entrepreneurs' subjective well-being. Journal of management, spirituality & religion, 13 (1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2015.1043575 Go to original source...
    58. Smith W. K., Besharov M. L., Wessels A., Chertok M. (2012). A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11 (3), 463-478. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0021 Go to original source...
    59. Smith W. K., Gonin M., Besharov M. L. (2013). Managing Social-Business Tensions: A Review and Research Agenda for Social Enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23 (3), 407-442. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201323327 Go to original source...
    60. Tóth L., Varga É., Varga P. (2011). A társadalmi vállalkozások helyzete Magyarországon (The situation of social enterprises in Hungary), NESsT EUROPE Nonprofit Kft., Budapest.
    61. Vansteenkiste M., Lens W., Deci E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational psychologist, 41 (1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4 Go to original source...
    62. Yitshaki R., Kropp F. (2018). Revisiting entrepreneurial motivation and opportunity recognition. In Brännback M., Carsrud A. L. (Ed.), A Research Agenda for Entrepreneurial Cognition and Intention (pp. 122-141). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: 10.4337/9781784716813.00011 Go to original source...
    63. Yunus M. (2006). Nobel Laureate acceptance speech, Oslo, December 10. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2006/yunus-lecture-en.html.
    64. Zahra S. A., Gedajlovic E., Neubaum O. D., Shulman J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 519-532. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content